Britain is cooked..
Chapters7
Discussion on whether a woman can have a penis and the implications for gender identity.
A provocative, controversial clip where Asmongold TV confronts trans rights, biology debates, and immigration politics with blunt, provocative takes.
Summary
Asmongold TV delivers a high-energy, combative monologue that rides the edge of identity politics and national policy. The host pushes back against questions about gender, insisting on binary biology while acknowledging the complexities others see in gender identity. He threads together rhetoric about science, sociopolitical framing, and a critique of “identity politics” with sharp personal judgments about public figures and media narratives. The discussion also veers into immigration policy and polling, using provocative hypotheticals and polemical comparisons to illustrate his points. Interspersed are references to real-world tensions—policies, Supreme Court rulings, and culture-war framings—that set the stage for a broader debate on how society defines gender and governs borders. The tone stays combative, unapologetic, and intentionally provocative to spark discussion and controversy. This piece will resonate with viewers who enjoy blunt takes on hot-button topics and want a no-nonsense critique of current discourse.
Key Takeaways
- Binary biology is argued as the default viewpoint, with claims that there are two genders and that medical or sociological arguments are
- The host uses provocative analogies (e.g., medical abnormalities) to challenge nuanced gender discussions and to frame opponents as irrational.
- There is a strong emphasis on blaming political opponents for “culture war” tactics while tying policy failures (healthcare, education) to broader social debates.
- The segment links gender debates to broader political campaigns, including comments on who should lead and how elections are framed around trans issues.
- Immigration policy and national identity are invoked to argue political points, including criticisms of border policies and demographic changes.
- The tone is confrontational and opinionated, prioritizing a provocative, debate-friendly style over neutral analysis.
Who Is This For?
Essential viewing for viewers who crave blunt, unapologetic takes on gender debates, culture wars, and immigration politics. Those who enjoy combative commentary and want to hear a polarizing perspective on current events will find this engaging.
Notable Quotes
""A woman is a gender. Sorry. A woman is a gender; biological and gender is complicated. Gender is a spectrum.""
—The speaker argues against a binary view of gender, framing gender as a spectrum.
""There are only two genders. There is no third gender. Anybody that's interex or something like that, this is a medical abnormality.""
—A firm rejection of non-binary or intersex conceptions as medical abnormalities.
""If you think earth is flat, you can't be trusted to make decisions for anything else... gender stuff is the exact same.""
—Uses a compare-and-contrast analogy to challenge opponents' views on gender.
""This issue is accessible to every single person. Everybody knows what gender is. Everybody knows what a man is. Everybody knows what a woman is.""
—Frames gender as universally understood to bolster his arguments.
""Send him to Afghanistan... that’s what I’ll vote for... and anybody who tries to talk to a kid about being trans...""
—Expresses extreme political solutionism and punitive stance toward trans topics in youth.
Questions This Video Answers
- How does this speaker justify a binary view of gender and critique non-binary identities?
- What are the political implications of framing gender debates as a culture war?
- How does immigration policy intersect with national identity discussions in this video?
- What criticisms does the speaker raise about media narratives around trans rights?
- Why do some commentators tie healthcare and education issues to identity politics?
AsmongoldTVGender identityTrans rightsBiology vs. sociologyCulture warImmigration policyBritish politicsPublic discoursePolitical rhetoricContemporary media debates
Full Transcript
Can a woman have a penis? Yes. It's going to take them a long time on the National Health Service to get rid of it, but that's another separate problem. Leave it on. A woman can have a penis. People I think you're lacking nuance and complexity about a pretty complicated. You couldn't have been clearer. I'm clear because actually when you want to look at the science, you were crystal clear. The science simple question, but you're laughing at it, which I think demeaning trans doesn't make you a woman. It makes you a trans woman. A biological woman and a trans woman are different.
Like I don't know why this is so hard for people to understand. Duh. Of course against trans people. Why are you punching down? Why are you not saying problem? Look at this. See, it's the reframing. Why are you punching down? Well, um because they're wrong. They're wrong. It's annoying and I don't want to deal with it. I don't think anybody does. This is [ __ ] annoying. I've already told you that I think trans people sound like you have a huge problem with trans people No. No. What a little [ __ ] Oh my god. He's got a huge problem with trans people because he doesn't think women can have dicks.
Is that right? It sounds to me like you don't understand what a woman is, which I I think is a huge problem for someone leading a party in this country. A woman is a gender. Sorry. A you said what's a woman? A woman is a gender biological and gender is complicated. Gender is a spectrum. Complicated. A woman is a gender spectrum. Is it that binary? Do you think it is binary? It's completely binary. The invented sociology from fake Karen consensuses that have fake credentials for agreeing with the other fake credentials. Uh it actually has no weight, no value, no influence and it's completely made up.
There are only two genders. There is no third gender. Anybody that's interex or something like that, this is a medical abnormality. If you ask somebody, how many arms does a human being have? They would, every single person would say two arms. But just because some people are born with one arm, doesn't mean that the answer isn't two. So whenever you're looking at interex people or other degrees of medical deformities, this is not included inside of normal everyday speaking. You ask somebody how many fingers does a person have? They say 10 fingers. Many people are born with nine fingers.
But nobody would hesitate to answer the question how many fingers does a person have? Everybody would say 10 because we logically and rationally know that medical deformities and abnormalities are not included in the generalities that we v that we talk about that are 99.9% of the outcomes. Right? So that's number one. Number two, um, no, there is no there is no gray area between this. You're either a man or a woman. That's it. There there's literally no spectrum at all. This is invented. This is a the entire philosophy for this is completely invented. It's it's made up.
And also, here's a very important component to it. It is invented with no actual scientific basis on hard science. There is no actual hard science for this. This is all sociology. And what sociology is is basically taken over by a bunch of Karens that want to sit around and agree with each other and they want to invent things that aren't real. Just because a bunch of psych just because a bunch of psychologists got together and decided something, that doesn't make it real. It doesn't. This is all soft science. Also known as [ __ ] People are born male and female.
Uh, not necessarily. Oh, for God's sake. I think it's more complicated than that. It's not more complicated, Z. It's not more complicated than that. If you're a TV show host who wants to make it binary and ridiculous, you're going to have to have a nuance that actually reflects. I know when I asked you if you want when I asked you if you want to be president. See, this is what they do is they try to make an appeal to science while at the same time denying it. So actually science is very clear about this. And do they want to talk about the science of IQ distribution of different races in different countries?
Absolutely not. Never let these people use your values against you. These people are the most anti-scientific, anti-factbased people that you can possibly ever imagine. They hate science. They hate facts. They hate rationality. And they want to replace it with their argumentation that is none of those. But they want to replace it with that and then make it to where you can't criticize it. That's what they're doing. I hate this guy. I do. I hate him. Minister, there is not a cat in hell's chance of you ever becoming prime minister if you don't know what a woman is.
Well, you'll see us going up in the polls. We're the most favorable party in London right now. So, let's see. Why do you start going out tomorrow with your big campaign that women can have penises? And this also, by the way, should be the man campaigning focus against any of these people because what I what I view the I don't know what a woman is or I don't know how many genders there are, they are a frame of reference indicator. I've said this before, I'll go through it again. Would you trust the judgment of a person who thought that the earth was flat to make decisions for you?
I would not. Why not? Well, I mean, it's just one little thing. It has no bearing on everything else. The reason why is because it indicates a lapse in judgment and a breakdown in logical argumentation and decision-m that is so extreme, so problematic, and so ridiculous that this person can't be trusted to make a decision for anything else. You can't trust a person that thinks that the earth is flat to make a logically sound decision for other things. I view the gender stuff as the exact same. If you think this, you can't be trusted to make decisions for other topics because your mental facilities, your logical reasoning is compromised to such a fundamental degree that you actually just can't be trusted.
Now, you might get things right occasionally, but this is an accident rather than a system. It's a belief that means nothing or sorry, it like it means nothing, but it also means everything. Does that make sense? Like there's no real consequence of this belief, but if you believe it, it means everything because it's so ridiculous it should never be seen. That's the main issue and that's the reason why I think they need to hammer them on this issue. Absolutely make this the number one issue because this is something and the reason why is because this issue is accessible to every single person.
Everybody knows what gender is. Everybody knows what a man is. Everybody knows what a woman is. If you can't get over this, you have no business discussing econom economics. I'm sorry. You have no business discussing economics if you don't understand how many genders there are. That's it. That's uh that that's your scientific uh ableism. Well, what do you mean by that? And what about females born with male genitals? Do they come under trends? No, they're just medical abnormalities and they shouldn't be used in discussing uh topics like this. Obviously, why would you make why why would you discuss a topic whenever this is a medical abnormality?
Why why would you do that? That doesn't make sense. going out tomorrow with my big campaign about inequality in this country between the multimillionaires and billionaires and women say to me women have a penis because you're trying to distract from inequality and actually I think most this this is what they do is they use this oh we're fighting for the poor people they use it as a Trojan horse so they can push their sick identity politics on children they say that oh well we care about um you know education and we care about making sure about child care.
Well, if you really cared about kids, you wouldn't want them having to change in the gender of in the opposite gender, right? You wouldn't want men in the women's locker room. So, they don't actually care about kids. They don't care about the conversation. They just care about the fact they want to put food on the table. You are a fast emerging people. You are you are a fast. And I I do think that this is the problem is that people like him have totally outflanked the I think right-wing people because right-wing people are unwilling to compromise with the fantasy that everybody can earn their own way.
I think that if you had a right-wing person who didn't have any of the cultural [ __ ] opinions like this guy or Zoran Mandami, but he had the same socialist policies, I think that person would win a double-digit amount of people in a national vote. I do. I think that that's all it takes because this is the issue. Basically, you can either have good social policies and a bunch of foreigners or you can have no foreigners and shitty social policies. That's the problem. And so like and I think that people want something that's in between that emerging politician in this country.
I'm perfectly entitled to ask you that in Germany one time. Well, it happens everywhere. And I I know that people like to reframe it like it's Nazis or something like that. But the reality is that are we Nazis because we have social security? Of course not. Are we Nazis because we have food stamps? Of course not. But these are national social programs that you could, you know, if you intentionally misunderstand the words, you could reframe them as being national socialist policies definitionally. So it's again, it's another intentional misunderstanding. You're absolutely entitled and people are entitled to the ludicrousness of these questions rather than tackling the inequality and the fact we're not funding our national health service, the fact we've got schools crumbling, the fact that people are struggling to put food on the table.
That's what people are worried about, not trans people. Okay. Well, if they're not worried about that and you're losing elections over it, then why don't you just stop using this issue? But they won't. And that's the thing is that if this issue, and this is what they do, is they try to always make and appeal the triviality. They might they try to say that, well, you know, this is a very small issue it doesn't matter that much. Okay, well, if it's so small and it doesn't matter that much, then why don't you just relinquish it and then just let other people take the reigns and let them decide because obviously they care about it a lot.
But you don't want to do that because you're actually just holding these economic policies hostage so you can put men in women's bathrooms bathrooms, excuse me. That's the reason why they're focused on the important issues like Bernie. Well, yeah, exactly. And he never talks about those issues. But you can't win an argument against someone that's not staying or stable. Yeah, exactly. He'll say the right is fueling the culture war whenever it's actually the left that complains about lack of non-white representation. people like this, the reason why they care about the culture war is because they want to assume that they've already won it.
I I I don't think that we are harsh enough towards these people. I don't I don't think so. I think that the level of extremity and the level of consequence these people need to deal with has to be substantially higher than what it's what it's at now. And I think that like I mean, as I said before, like I will always vote for people that do that. Um, like whenever we have somebody that is willing to take people like this and literally just send them to Afghanistan, that's who I'll vote for. That's going to be my guy.
Sorry. That's what's going to happen. And anybody who tries to talk to a kid about being trans or somebody that did like a tr like a an operation on a kid or gave a kid hormones for being trans and the kid was 13. Now you're going to jail for 20 years. for something that you did back then and now you're being retroactively punished for it. That's right. That's right. That's what you got to do. And that's the nice way. It could be even worse than that. But I'm a nice guy. They're worried about women's rights.
I'm worried about women's rights, too. But as I said, we I I offered several times to talk about the police force. I offered several times to talk about the inequality. You want to talk about other things. I get that. I want to talk about women's rights. Let's have a conversation about women's rights, but let's not talk about trans women specifically. But you think women have penises? You said to me, "Can a woman have a penis?" And I said, "Yes." So if they're transitioning, for instance, and of course a woman can have a penis. Well, no, because if you're transitioning, it doesn't make you a woman.
I mean, it that's the reason why. When were you a doctor or an expert in in women's rights? You need to be an expert. Court has made it crystal clear. The Supreme Court's job is to look at legislation and then make a legal ruling. Okay. So, you know more than the Supreme Court. Well, yes. Actually, in this case, yes, I do. Of course. Right. There it is. And uh like he is. Yeah. Exactly. And uh if you're a woman, why would you transition? Well, I don't know. I mean, like some women feel like they're men.
They can do whatever they want, but it's obviously not the same. And uh look at this. Here's another one. Twain shall meet unfortunately on this one. Um, we do have to bring you our vote because you have been voting in the text and online vote today. So, here is the result. Is multiculturalism working? Here is what you told us. 5% of those of you who voted said yes it is. 95% of those of you who voted this morning said no, it isn't. Oh man, on this one. Um, [ __ ] we do have to bring you our vote because you have been voting in the text and online voting, man.
How about that? No comment, nothing to say. There it is. Wow. And uh, it's got to be worse than that, too. This is Ari, Gwendelyn, and Brifa. They are in a polyamorous relationship, and they all parent Hazel and Sparrow. We have a 2-year-old anti-gender baby and a 10year-old who is non-binary. They have chosen not to disclose Sparrow's gender. We don't know it yet. It's something that Sparrow's going to have to figure out and then tell us, but their parenting approach is controversial. Talk about spawning in hard mode. Can you imagine this? Like if this kid just turns out to be normal, not super successful, just normal, this is gonna be like a success story that nobody's ever heard of before.
This is going to be crazy. I have like a normal person becoming a billionaire. Crazy crazy lady. I hope karma hits you back and your kids grow up to detest you. Uh-huh. My extraordinary family. These polyamorous parents let their children choose their gender. male for their oldest child, Hazel. That's neither male nor female. Please tell us how and why you decided to come out as non-binary. Because the pronouns she and he did not fit, non-binary was what I turned to. Though I do choose to act and look um more feminine. Can I go down now?
Of course. This poor kid. 2 and 1/2year-old sparrow has yet 2 and 1/2 years old and you're already getting farmed by the gender freaks. Two and a dude. Wow. To make a choice about their gender. Sparrow, do you want a banana? They're anti-gender, but we're using they anti-gender. Oh, wow. Pronouns. Sure, they have anatomy. We understand it, but like it's not indicative of their identity. This poor kid. It's something that Sparrow's going to have to figure out and then tell us before we can tell anyone else. Oh, particularly because it's, you know, something that our parents did and they got it wrong.
Man, there it is. Our parents didn't treat us the right way. So now we're indoctrinating and grooming these children into thinking the right thing. Oh my [ __ ] god. Isn't this sick? This is absolutely The three should just be in jail. I know. I know. And that's what should happen. But we'll see. Uh we'll see if it ever does. I don't know if it will or not. Oh, here we go. Send him to Iran. God, I resisted for a long time this notion that Democrats were deliberately inviting masses of uh foreigners into the country uh because they wanted to to grow little Democrats and create a one party state.
Um, I've I've started to come round to that view. Before Trump uh effectively closed the southern border, I imagined a lot of it was incompetence and fecklessness. Now, there may be an element of that. They're waking up, but the boomers are more intentional. The Biden administration opened that border on purpose. They did and shipped people all over where they wanted to go. Absolutely. They put illegal migrants with no ID onto commercial airplanes. With regular passengers. You all have to have, you know, an impeccable national ID. Mhm. I mean, it's just it it there is design behind it.
And I I don't have any other theory aside from this pathological passion for minorities and a weird uh notion that uh people who are non-white are superior. Y I I I don't see any other reason for inviting so many people in, especially because, you know, on the one hand, the left talks about, oh, we need these people economically. we have this aging um age structure and you know social security's um imperiled and social security is imperiled. Let's bring in more people that will drain it and Medicare costs too much and we need young people to fill out the workforce but then you know they support family reunification which means these these people can bring in their parents.
Yeah. Right. I mean, so much for improving the age structure. Yep. That's right. That's right. Now you see it. Now you see it. There it is. It's so [ __ ] obvious. There it is.
More from Asmongold TV
Get daily recaps from
Asmongold TV
AI-powered summaries delivered to your inbox. Save hours every week while staying fully informed.



