I GOT EXPOSED..

Let me see. Here we go. Exposing the grift. Asmin Gold doesn't understand DEI and affirmative action. Uh-oh. This will be good. Round two. Yes. Well, it's a shorter video. Lord of the Fleas has blessed us with yet another [ __ ] take on Twitter. This time alleging that black people benefit from systematic racism. Correct. We're going to debunk this nonsensical claim. Thank God. And this time I'll try to be as brief as I can for old double- digit IQ here because my last video was too long for him. Yeah, I'm not going to sit around and react to a [ __ ] video that's an hour and a half long. It's too long. Yeah, it is. It's too long. So, I'll have to reexplain the start stop buttons for you, Zach, because you were too [ __ ] to respond to my previous video where I cooked your monkey ass for over an hour. You know, the one where your excuse for ducking me was an hour is too long for me to grift. That's like, yeah, it is because the viewers are going to get bored. It takes too long. Like, we've got other things we need to go through and talk about. I don't have all day to talk about one thing. 12 large Dr. peppers and even I can't rotten my teeth out with that much. Isn't it strange how you respond to the video where I barely talk about you at all, where you lied and claimed I called you racist the whole video? That's sad. Wow, mic drops. I know. So, basically, this guy spent his entire video calling me racist. You sure about that? You sure about that? You sure about that? Yeah. Let's ask the AI. Does the Birdman specifically call Asthma Gold a racist in this video? Label Asmin Gold a racist, but he does argue that the claim Asmin Gold made on social media is racist. So, was it you only said your claims? Is this the other video? Let me go back and see it. I haven't seen it at all. Let me go pull this up. Right. Okay. So, there you go. You're literally your own AI evaluation says this. Let me let me pull this up. Listen to it. Brings us back to Zach's tweet. Right. Yes. This claim is racist because it was made by There we go. He No, no, he's not. No, no. He's not saying you're racist. He's saying everything that you're saying is racist and made a video about it, right? Of course. Yes. Uh-huh. So, that was a [ __ ] lie. But the video where I spent the length of a short film ramming my fist up your ass is the one you ran away from. It's too long. It's too I'm not going to watch a long video. Oh, since you missed it, red means shut the [ __ ] up. I'm still talking. What is this? Green means this from his other video. It's your turn to speak. You seem to have difficulty understanding when someone hasn't finished making a point, so I have to get elementary on your ass. So, he made this. So, he made this video for me. Well, that's nice. IQ after all. Okay. Anyway, a few days ago, Zachariah here posted this tweet in response to Joe Bardozi refuting the claim that black people are more likely to commit crimes than white people. Let's have a listen. Do not commit more crimes than white people on a personality basis. If you're going to say statistically they do, that is only because of impoverished areas in the lives that they've been given because of the implications that have been put on them. This can be immediately disproven in multiple ways. But I I I'll let this go through anyway. They've been given a [ __ ] hand and therefore live in that [ __ ] hand and are more likely to commit crimes if they're impoverished living in areas where they have to to survive. If you were to take a group of people and put them in an impoverished area, they're likely to commit more crimes because they have not not entirely. Uh that's sometimes the case, but there are vectors that are beyond socioeconomic reasons being helped in the way that they need to be. But if you meet a black guy on the street and you say to his face he's more likely to commit a crime than you, you're [ __ ] racist. Yes. Whatever statistical fact you're going to throw is clouded by the idiocy of yourself to not recognize why that fact is in existence. Not because black people are genetically more likely to commit a crime. That's stupid. So Joe is obviously correct, but his argument can do with a bit of So he's Okay, so he's obviously correct, but why is he correct? Okay, let's hear why he's correct. Cleaning up. And that's what I'm here for. What Joe is referring to is the correlation of poverty and crime. This is a very well understood phenomenon. This is actually, by the way, you guys might not know this, but the only correlation with crime is poverty. There is no other correlation at all that exists. This is the only one. Those placed under economic strain, limited opportunities, and weakened social structures often resort to property and violent crime. A large body of criminology and sociology research has found a consistent relationship between poverty, inequality, and crime across many different countries and ethnic groups. Studies from the United States, Indonesia, Latin America, Europe, and crossnational data sets all show that areas with higher poverty, unemployment, and economic deprivation tend to experience higher rates of certain crimes, particularly violent and property crime. A 2021 study published in the NLM found that more This, by the way, all of this is true. It doesn't refute my argument at all. This does not refute my argument in any capacity, but yes, obviously people that are poor commit more crime. Yeah, duh. Enequal societies tend to have higher crime as well as lower social trust. Interestingly, the study also found that the more equal the distribution of resources, the higher the trust equilibrium and that increasing punishment severity. Trust equilibrium is also established by having homogeneous society that's not multi-racial or multi- um multithnic. uh there's also another factor for that. So if you think that's the only vector that you should use, you would also be advocating for that too. Is not effective at this goal. And that particular piece of information relates to our pal pig pen here where he has routinely argued for more severe punishment. Looks like science disagrees with him. Surprise, surprise. Science. This is by the way, this is not science. Sociology and everything about this is not science. It is Karen consensus. That's all there is. Fix agree. Yeah, this this video is very obnoxious, but that's fine. Anyway, similar findings have appeared in studies examining crime in Mexico, Indonesia, Canada, and across the European Union, like this one here, where it's shown that people who are at risk of poverty report experiencing higher crime in their local area. So, you see, this pattern is global and not unique to any ethnic group. poor community. Uh it isn't unique to any ethnic group, but different ethnic groups and different age brackets and genders commit crime at much different rates. This is an obvious truth even inside of poverty. So in order to determine whether somebody is going to commit crimes or not, you're or what the probability of them doing that or not, the way that you do that is through a multifaceted approach. There's not only one factor that goes into committing crimes. If there was and that was the only factor that mattered, then you would see poverty that would have a onetoone correlation between every single other instance of uh of these different demographics committing crimes. But that's not the case. And the reason that's not the case is because it's not true. It's that simple. In parts of Eastern Europe and impoverished regions in Asia all experienced elevated crime rates compared to the wealthier populations around them. The same socio-economic mechanisms observed in poor black American neighborhoods are observed worldwide amongst people of entirely different ethnicities and cultures. Even the white supremacist favorite non-white country, Japan, experiences higher crime rates when poverty and unemployment rates rise, as shown in this study. Moving slightly west, South Korea is experiencing what they call a silver crime wave, where the It's actually crazy that somebody can be this stupid. It's really crazy that somebody can think that poverty is the only defining variable that has to do at all with crime. It's unbelievable. It's genuine. It It's genuinely impressive. Wealthy people don't get caught. Well, wealthy people So, this is the reality. The poorer you are, the higher the probability is that you will commit crime. However, there are also different genetic variabilities. There are other cultural variabilities. There is gender as well. Here, if if if income is the main predictor on whether people would commit crime or not, who do you guys think commits more crime? Rich men or poor women? Which one? Rich man. We all know this. So, everybody knows this. And by the way, poor women. Well, do you want to look it up? Who commits more crime in the US? Poor women or rich men? Rich men commit far more crime overall than poor women in the United States. Man, men account for 72 to 80% of all arrests. And do you know why? And this has nothing to do with race, by the way. All I'm showing is that the argument that for some reason Yeah. This is common sense. Everybody knows this. And I can do it with race, too. Which group commits more crime. Poor Asians or black uh African-Americans? uh in the in the US. Oh, sorry. Um, let me go or sorry, Rich, let me look this up. Or Rich, excuse me. If it was only income, you wouldn't have this. So this art this is I I don't know how a person can be this stupid. I really don't. It's sad. Eyes of poverty and its aging. He never said that. He did say that. He's implying that the reason why there's a difference between crime is because of socioeconomic status. And even when you control for socioeconomic status, there is a dramatic variance in crime based off of ethnicities. This is a it's not a conversation point. It is a defined fact that is statistically represented. Elation has seen a commensurate rise in crime. All of this does not mean poverty mechanically causes every individual to commit crime, nor does every poor community become highly violent. But the broader statistical relationship between resource deprivation and crime appears repeatedly across continents and populations. This is why many scholars argue that racial disparities in crime are better understood through the lens of concentrated poverty, inequality, historical segregation, and access to opportunity rather than race itself. The funny thing about this is that black people are the only group of people that's ever been discriminated against in America. That's it. They've No other group of people has ever been discriminated against in America at all. This is a surprise. I I didn't know this. Mhm. This a trigger black eye. Yeah. I I don't know. I think this is an AI voice, so I'm not even sure if this guy's black in the first place, but who knows? The reason black people are associated with crime in the United States is because black Americans have historically faced disproportionate levels of concentrated poverty, segregation, underinvestment, and systemic exclusion from economic opportunity. None of that stuff makes you steal makeup from a CVS. None of that makes you commit murder. None of that makes you go out and violently rob people. The idea that this is somehow okay or acceptable or anything else. This is also immediately disproven whenever you control for socioeconomic factors. Immediately this is disproven. No, it's not because of that. And also this wasn't even what I said by the way. None of this even had anything to do with it. Period. Conditions that criminologists and sociologists have repeatedly linked to higher crime rates across every population on Earth, regardless of ethnicity. Of course. Once black American slaves were freed, they immediately face disc Wait a minute. We're talking about freed. Yeah, I'm pretty sure we got rid of slavery. That's really like Yeah, I feel like that's what happened. Am I Am I confused by this? So, this has always been my outlook about it is that there have been a lot of groups inside of America that have been oppressed, that have been denied opportunities or having other things that are like that. Anytime that you're advocating for an advantage for one group of person versus another group, fundamentally what you're doing is you are trying to institutionalize racism. You are trying to implement and enact racism. And the reality is that the people that are poor that are white probably has less advantages than somebody who's rich who's black. So I do agree that people should get, you know, help, but it shouldn't be done on a racial basis. It should be done on a means basis, on an income basis. That's obviously what should happen. But yes, the quote freed the slaves. Yeah. Yeah, they actually did free the slaves. Oh my god. We face discrimination, a lack of economic opportunities, exclusion from wealthbuilding institutions. We fixed all these, by the way. We fixed all these. Segregated housing, unequal education, targeted policing, and widespread racial violence. each of those things on Well, isn't it crazy how a lot of that widespread racial violence kind of just disappeared? I feel like we don't really see a lot of that anymore. We don't. And when we do, it's the other way around. I don't want to see that. Nope. Their own contribute to poverty, which I have just proven correlates with crime. Poverty does correlate with crime, but that's not the only thing that correlates with crime. This doesn't refute my argument or my position at all. Black people were subjected to all of them at the same time. The United States created a permanent underclass in the form of black Americans. It's a permanent underclass. If it's a permanent underclass and how Barack Obama become the president, there's plenty of successful black people. What are you talking about? It's not what What do you mean? freeing formerly enslaved people without providing meaningful economic restitution, equal protection under the law, or fair access to housing, education, and employment while simult historically this is accurate. But current day and in recent history, this hasn't really been true. Like at least not really in my lifetime. Like maybe you can point to like one example of like some racist law in like Mississippi or something, but overall we've gotten rid of a lot of this. Pop quiz ass on mold. What do you do when you don't have access to decent education, can't get a job, live in a slum, and can barely feed yourself? You burn down the CVS, you steal makeup, you shoot each other, and you kill people, right? That's obviously what the solution is because that's the only logical thing that a person could do. I mean, it's not like they could get a job. It's not like they could educate themselves. It's not like you could do any of this other stuff. No, I I believe that people have agency. They clearly have agency. What Just because that you're you're poor, so it's okay to rob a CVS. What the [ __ ] This is like the most [ __ ] logic I've ever heard. Oh my god. If you want to show this, it's a classic. What is this here? Can I pull it up? Do you remember years ago there was a storm in New Orleans? Hurricane Katrina? Yeah, I remember it. Okay, check this out. What do you think those people are doing? Surviving or looting? They're surviving. Okay. Do you remember a man named Rodney King? Yes, of course. Okay. The LAPD worked them over really good. Okay. This was taken during the Rodney King riots. What do you think these people are doing? Looting or surviving? Well, they're looting. Of course. Well, it's the media. See, when it's white people, it's survival. And when it's black people, it's looting. No, Frank. It's because the white people are stealing bread and the black people are stealing speakers. If the white people were stealing stereo equipment, I would say they were looting, too. How do you know the blacks don't have bread in those speakers? WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT ARE WE TALKING ABOUT? RHINO THINGS TO DO. OKAY. DAMN, I forgot even about that. So, yeah. Uh, no. Uh, being poor isn't an excuse for stealing. Uh, being poor isn't an excuse for killing people. It's not an excuse for being violent. Uh, you can't have a world where that is. like you you I if if that was the way the world worked, everything would be chaos. Statistically, you turn to crime. It's not a black thing. It's a human thing. So, this is what Joe was trying to communicate that black Americans face conditions that overwhelmingly correlate with higher crime rates. And that this is uh you you listed one condition, the the the singular condition of being more poor on average. I think everybody agrees and everybody is on the same page that having less income is going to correlate to being more violent or committing more crimes. I think this is obviously true. Everybody knows that due to systemic racism. All those factors I just named were racist and all of them were systemic red and they are all gone. And they're all gone. That's the difference. We went through and got rid of every single one of those lining or the process of systematically denying minority communities access to mortgages, loans, and investment based on their race helped trap many black Americans in impoverished and underdeveloped neighborhoods for generations. That is obviously racist. That is really So that's the re Well then if you even your own Wikipedia article disproves this. Look at this here. as well as Mexicanameans, southwestern United States, Jewish Americans, and Italian-Americans. If this is a causal factor for this to happen, you would see those same rates happening with those other groups. No, that's not the case. You're literally not even reading the articles you're using. How is it possible that somebody can be this stupid? Oh my god. It literally says it right there. Oh my god, this is so sad. Burman's point's only valid if we're talking 100 years ago. Yeah, if he if if this video was made a hundred years ago, I think he'd have a good argument. Irish and Italian started with nothing, too. And yet, look at this here. This is Irish and Italian people. Let me go back and pull this up. Oh, wow. estimated incarceration and commitment rates. So, so this is it between Irish and Italian. There it is. Wow. Look at that. Big surprise, huh? Who could have guessed? It It's crazy how you're using arguments that literally don't even work. Like, it your own evidence disproves itself. like he starts the video off and he looks for an AI summary to disprove that he called me racist and then the AI summary says that he spent the video saying that what I said was racist. Then he's using this and it says it's not just against people that are black. This has happened to multiple ethnicities and multiple ethnic groups, but you're talking about one. If this is a causal factor, then you would assume that this causal factor would also affect the crime rates of these other four groups. The same with with uh what do you call it with income. But that's not the case. That is systemic because it was a government sponsored organization that invented this and it was legal. Uhhuh. Systemic. It was. We hear that word a lot. Mhm. A lot of was the main way a family in the United States builds wealth is through real estate. If you own a home, you generally pass that home down to your children. And since your children are now not required to use the majority of their income for housing, they are able to save, invest, pursue education, start businesses, and accumulate wealth. Black people don't own homes. Only white people have homes. This you you might not have known this. This is a surprise. more easily themselves, creating a compounding cycle of Italian and yeah, Irish and and Italian Americans didn't have a house either. Yeah. Like, what do you like? This isn't even like it it's such [ __ ] Okay. Anyway, let's keep going. Wealth. If you routinely deny black families the opportunity to own valuable real estate, you rob them of the opportunity to create generational wealth. What is the This is actually a good argument. And I think that really the best way to approach this argument and this problem, I do think that there's a huge generational wealth gap between white and also black families and it has been caused by a degree of like residuals from racism. So he is identifying the problem and that is correct. But the solution that I have is different than the solution that he has. So the reason why I think that something like DEI or affirmative action is bad is because it's not actually addressing the problem. It's addressing a corollary, which is the correlary is race, but the problem is actually income. So I'm totally in support of things like, you know, giving people uh more student aid if they don't have as much money. But it should be done on the basis of means, not on the basis of race. And again, the only people that would disagree with this are literal racists because the goal there isn't to be in any sort of a beneficial position for being white or black. White Americans aren't even a top earner ethnically in the U. US. Yeah. And this is also another factor too is that like I don't know if you guys have seen this as well, but take a look at this. Indian-Americans, Filipino Americans, Taiwanese Americans, white Americans are all the way down here at $59,000 for median household income. So, are these people that are up at the top committing all these crimes or are these people doing that? No, I don't think so. So, these are random uncorrelated things. Yeah, federal aid was perfect. It was. So, I have no problem with acknowledging that black people will be more disproportionately affected by programs that help people because of income. But I don't think those programs should be done and decided based off of race. If the problem is that these people were denied generational wealth, then the way that you should solve that problem shouldn't be based off of off of race. It should be based off of wealth. But that's not what they want to do. It's because they don't care about that. they care about figuring out some sort of racist way. And this is the problem is that this is why I think I trigger a lot of these people is because I'm one of the only people that actually isn't racist. I'm looking at this objectively. I say, "Yes, you're correct that black people have been disproportionately affected by this. Let's try to correct that." Okay. So, the problem is that people weren't able to get money. All right. Well, a lot of people don't have money. Why don't we make a thing to where people that don't have money are able to get money and it'll help black people disproportionately? That's the way a logical, reasonable, empathetic person would solve problems. But they don't want to do that because they don't have actually they don't care about equality. They care about talking [ __ ] and being racist. That's the reason why. Get a job. Well, I mean, I'm talking about for kids, right? Like a kid trying to get into college or something like that. They Yeah. They're the ones making it about race and there's no reason for Wealth gap. And why is everyone talking about it? The racial wealth gap is a measure of wealth inequality between racial groups in the US. Here's a prime example. Black families make up 14% of the population but own only 5% of American wealth. While white households make up 65% of the population but control 80% of the wealth. The gap traces back to the 1863 emancipation. This argument can also be immediately refuted whenever you look at different uh groups that are outside of white people that control cuz like you know you look at 7% it was like 80% or something like that. There's like a missing 15% there. There are going to be like massive distortions because you have certain groups of people that come into the country and are very successful uh culturally in America. White and black people are not the only people that you can find in America. proclamation which led to freedom for almost 4 million black Americans. By 1860, their labor accounted for 60% of US exports, $200 million a year, but black Americans received nothing. Labor is not a necessary like it it is not a onetoone value creator. Just because you work very hard or you do something doesn't necessarily mean that that has the same value as what it's creating for that company. This is like just more commie slop. Uh it's just not it it's not true then for for anybody that was black. It's not true now for people that work inside of a company. It's just simply not true. No land, no money. Without any money or land, how could newly free black Americans create wealth? The second barrier to building wealth, housing discrimination, right? One significant driver to the racial wealth gap, as I mentioned before, is going to be home ownership. Home ownership is significant driver of wealth, whereby every year of home ownership, homeowners gain about $14,000 in in equity. Conversely, if you don't have access to home ownership, you don't have access to that type of equity. And that cushion that you could get from having money saved from home ownership discrimination allows banks and yeah, I mean, this isn't even an argument. I I think housing discrimination is removed, right? I mean, they got rid of that. I mean, I'm sure like maybe somewhere in like, you know, again, Mississippi, there might be something like that, which is obviously bad, but in a general sense that this is removed. They they got rid of this. Obviously, they got rid of this. Deny home loans to the black community through a practice called redlinining. Redlinining was a government sponsored practice of denying mortgages and other financial services. And you can see how this is, see, this is the grievance culture that is weaponized and inflicted against white people specifically. But if you look actually at the thing about red lining, you'll see that this is not a thing that is white and black. It is something that was affecting, as I said, it happened to Mexicans. It happened to Italians. It happened to Jewish people. It happened to other groups as well. This isn't something that's unique to uh just black people. this conversation makes me uh makes me and black people uncomfortable. I'm glad you're having it because you're absolutely right. Yeah, I I I know. And the thing is that the problem is that I think a lot of like reasonable people see what I'm saying and they agree with it, but there are people that are actually racist. Like once you I think this is the main thing is that once you recognize that the people that are advocating for this stuff are genuine racists, the rest of what they do makes sense. Because it's like logically, why would they not want to solve the problem by approaching the wealth disparity by attacking the wealth disparity itself? It's because they're racist. That's the reason why they're using equality as something to get people on board. But what they're really trying to do is advocate for other forms of racial advantages for them and people like them. That's the reason why. It's because they are racist to segregated black and brown neighborhoods. It's called redlinining because bankers literally drew red lines around undesirable communities. One black household in a middle-ass community was enough to make the federal government deny mortgage loans in that area. As a result, black families turned to predatory lenders or were shut out from home ownership completely. We just keep having to fight battles. But a lot of the things that have happened to black folks in America were orchestrated and they were legal. They were systemic. Well, what's the key word in that were they were now they're not. I mean, it wasn't like it just happened that way. Uh it was designed to be that way. And like all forms of systemic either way has nothing to do what you said in a tweet. Another strong study about firm of action medical school acceptance rates here. Yeah, I'll pull that one up after this. After this is the uh Oh my Oh my god. Okay, give me a minute. The downstream effects are seen in the modern day. And by the way, this is the United States Treasury website literally admitting one of the factors for this gap is due to the United States government. They are admitting their policies stifled black home ownership. It did. Systemic racism. Yes. And now we fixed it. That's correct. Now, back to Zach's dumbass tweet. The first [ __ ] line from this, which by the way is completely nothing about what I said. This has nothing to do with it at all. Is that black people benefit from systemic racism. Correct. Now, I know what Zach is trying to say here. That through policies like affirmative action, black people benefit and that because affirmative action is a governmental policy that is systemic. The problem with this line of logic is that it's not racism. Okay, that mean that oh my god, whatever you want to call it, it's bad. Like, I don't know. You want to say it's prejudice. You want to say that it's bias. You want to say that it's unfair, whatever you want to call it, it's still going to be bad. And it the reason why they say that it's not racist is because they're the ones that are racist. They want to control the usage of the word racism so they can use it to control conversations. He's dancing around terminology. Yes, obviously. Yes. Affirmative action effectively produced outcomes where an equally qualified white man could be disqualified for an equally qualified black man. But that's racist. What do you mean? Like that's literally if so that means that you pick the person over their skin color. That's literally racist. What What are we even doing? Oh my god. This is like you you just I I I don't even know what to say. So take a look at this. This is the thing I was going to show you guys. Medical school acceptance rates in the United States from 2013 to 2016. If you had a score of a I guess 24 to 26 with a 3.2 to a 3.9. If you were Asian, you had a 6% chance to get accepted. If you were black, you had a 56% chance to get accepted. That's systematic. That's insane. Holy [ __ ] So, there it is. That's [ __ ] up. And yes, and and I I want you guys to see this because this is how unbalanced and how unfair it is. Like look at these charts. I mean this is an insane like this is an insane breakdown. And also like this is like I mean 6 versus 56 21 versus 80 81. If black people have lower GPA would uh would it explain more blacks being admitted with lower GPA? If they have a lower GPA then they shouldn't be admitted. Why would you be admitting people based off of their skin color? I was reading the graph wrong and I might just be [ __ ] Don't worry about it. Anyway, yeah. So, this is uh this is what happens. And it's embarrassing. And and by the way, this is the systematic and systemic racism that I was talking about. these DEI diversity opportunities that are presented for minority groups at the expense of other groups of people, primarily white people and also Asians. As you can see here, whites and Asians are being dramatically suppressed. This doesn't happen accidentally. It it doesn't like this is happening because it's being done on purpose. This process also held that an equally qualified white woman would be chosen over an equally qualified black man. In fact, white, it's not racemen were the largest beneficiaries of DEI and affirmative action policies. So, because white women were beneficiaries of DEI, it doesn't mean that DEI was racist. It obviously does. You say this all the time. Yeah. What is this here? Can I find this that that that's not even an argument? Primarily, you know, like again, do you want to know who the biggest beneficiaries of DEI are? It's not black people. It's white women. Those are the ones that are really winning out of DEI. They're the ones that are actually getting hired because of these processes. Yeah. It's [ __ ] Karens. That's it. And so this is we know this. Everybody knows this. I've said it multiple times. There's another one. Let me see. Preferential treatment. The biggest beneficiaries of DEI aren't black people. It's white women ngo and companies first. Exactly. So, these are the reasons why this is not an argument. Saying that white women benefit from it too, so it can't be racist is crazy. It's both sexist and racist. Like that that the best evaluation of this argument is that it is both sexist and racist, which is true, by the way. It is true. This is sad. So, by definition and by practice, affirmative action, even with the parameters of an own argument, he's uh he's wrong about two things at the same time. Yep. a systemically racist policy because all ethnic groups benefited from that policy and it disproportionately affected gender. So it is a lot all ethnic groups benefited from it and it disproportionately affected gender. Um yes uh it did affect gender as well but uh actually it like definitely white men did not benefit from it number one and also just because it benefits gender doesn't mean that it also benefits ethnic groups. And it also did create a tier list. And if that wasn't the case, then you wouldn't see the medical school acceptance rates be so different. It's just simply not true. Like 6 versus 56%. That's insane. Think about that. That affirmative action was racist. The best not was is it's race. It is racist because there are some instances of them continuing to do it now which I think need to be shut down by the government. argue here is that it is somewhat discriminatory towards white men and white men specifically because it literally benefits every single other group and even then that would be a lie as affirmative action includes mandates for hiring veterans and people with disabilities both groups. This is intentionally misunderstanding. You can just look at the college acceptance rates and you're going to see that very clearly they're done based on race. Yeah, it it's just intentionally misunderstanding. White men make up a significant portion. So, no, affirmative action and DEI are not a form of systemic racism. And no, black people in other minority groups do not enjoy preferential treatment at the expense of white and Asian people. They absolutely do. They overwhelmingly do. And it's obvious uh that this is the reason why you have the uh medical school acceptance rates. This is the reason why there are so many opportunities that are presented for people that are black. Like if you look at how many how many advocacy groups and how many foundations are set up to benefit black people versus white people on the basis of their skin color. So to say that this isn't true is to just actively deny reality. I think that a lot of people don't like saying what I'm saying because people are afraid that like people will say that you're racist for saying this. But in fact, I'm one of the only people that isn't racist. I think that everybody should be given a fair chance. And that also means that if you fail your fair chance, you lost fair and square. And the problem is that if you look at these different graphs, you can clearly see that there is a bias that's being set for race. There's a bias that's being set for ethnicity. And the moment that you start grading on a curve based off of ethnicity is the moment that you are literally institutionalizing and creating systematic racism. Just because the racism benefits you doesn't make it not racism. It just means that it's benefiting you. So you want to pretend like it's not happening. That's the reason why. It's very odd. Are you unaware that Asians are a minority group in the United States, too? Exactly. So why is the why is the crime rate so much different? Why would you group those two together? Zach, are you Because Asians Yeah. Well, yeah. Referring to the ridiculous Supreme Court ruling students ridiculous Supreme Court versus Harvard. Setting that aside for the moment. What? What do you What's LOOK AT THE GRAPH. THAT'S INSANE. Look at this. Oh my god. 56 versus 6 and 8%. The reason why I include Asians is because Asians are the only other minority group that get both ends of the [ __ ] stick. Not only were they put in internment camps if you were Japanese in World War II, but on top of that, now you're being systematically disenfranchised in college because you're doing too well. No, that's the reason why I'm including them. It's because it's [ __ ] It's [ __ ] for them. Also, a lot of the things that are happening for white people are not only happening white people that they're worse for Asians. There's the chart right there. But it's the Supreme Court ruling is ridiculous. Oh, of course. So, now let's get into how all the courts are rigged. Oh my god. The graph has nothing to do with the ruling. I knew he'd pull it up. So, these are two totally separate things. What other areas are black and Hispanic people benefiting at the expense of Asian people besides the overstated college admissions issue? Overstated. If this is overstated, guys, it's overstated. Give examples. I'm sure everyone would like to hear them, Zach. And please be very specific. Is this it? areas of black and Hispanic people getting expensive Asian people. There's that one. The college is massive. It's gigantic. Back to the Supreme Court issue. We currently have a compromise Supreme Court that is doing its damnness to The Supreme Court is compromised. They're making all the bad rulings. So basically, it's either you're right or they're scamming. There we go. Right. Oh. Oh my god. Oh my god. It's only oversaturated cuz Asians are white adjacent. Yes. Exactly. So this is yes and and finally the Supreme Court is making the right decisions conspiracy theories implement overwhelmingly conservative policies and rulings and these rulings almost always come at the expense of black Americans. Yeah. That's because there's a lot of institutional racial advantages that black Americans have that they shouldn't have. Things like affirmative action, DEI, preferential hiring processes, all of those things should be deleted. If there are no racial differences, then we should approach the problems like that by looking at commonalities that affect all groups of people such as income. We don't have slavery anymore. We don't have Jim Crow anymore. We don't have segregation anymore. No matter how much people want to cosplay on Twitter thinking that they're, you know, still in the Underground Railroad or something, we're not even anywhere near that at all. None of these things have anything to do with current day. It's income ruling in students v. Harvard was a joke because the prosecutions claimed Oh, it's a joke, right? Okay. So, now you're mauling about the Supreme Court case. Okay, got it. Hinged on the idea that American institutions like Harvard already operate on a level playing field, which we know they don't. At Harvard specifically, there are legacy admissions, donor preferences, networking advantages, and wealth inheritance that disproportionately benefit white students. Okay, they should get rid of that. I don't And also like disproportionately benefiting white students, that doesn't make it bad. This This is the thing. Like I I just Oh my god. This is why these people are actually just racist. They're actually just racist. they want to advocate for and say that oh well this be it's bad because it disadvantages uh or it gives advantages to white people. Meanwhile, they want something that's exclusive for an advantage for themselves. That's it. Oh my god, you're arguing with an non-starter. Yeah, they refuse to understand. I know. It's just so sad. Somehow the group suing Harvard ignored all of that to focus on the 18% of the class of 2027 who were black. Eight. 18%. This number decreased to 14% after the Supreme Court's ruling. Wow. The Asian cohort went from 37% to 37%. literally zero change to them, but a 4% drop in black student admission, which if you haven't been paying attention, is the [ __ ] goal. The group that's isn't the goal supposed to be having a fair admission process where you're able to apply and then be judged based off of your ability to uh, you know, perform well in a college. Like, I thought I I The goal isn't to get black people into college. The goal isn't to get white people into college. The goal is to get smart people into college. And the moment that you're not making decisions on whether somebody's smart or not and letting them go to college, you're making a mistake. Like it duh. Like I mean what are we even doing here? This is so stupid. Harvard students for fair admissions headed by this guy Edward Blum who has dedicated his entire career to dismantling progress in racial equality. based based patriot champion specifically black representation black representation. See, this is this is the verbal slight of hand that these people try to use is they try to use terms like representation and equality when what they're really saying is institutional preferential treatment that is now being rescended because the institutional preferential treatment is no longer justified because the counterbalance doesn't exist anymore. Things like, for example, Jim Crow or segregation. So, we don't need that anymore. So, but they use terms like equality and representation because they think that if you use these terms, people will have a harder time arguing against them because now they're not able to argue against equality and representation. So, no, this isn't going to work. Yeah, this guy's a patriot. I hope he keeps doing it. Thank God versus Vera, a Supreme Court case against redistricting in Texas that sought to increase racial minority representation in Congress. Fischer versus crying about a DEI district. Yeah, those are getting deleted now, aren't they? It's time to vote like an American. I know. It must be horrible. You can't be basing decisions off of racial bias. I know. Like I, you know, like me, I I don't know. I was hoping people would vote as Americans, not as an ethnicity. I don't want to have ethnic tribal voting in America. Nobody wants this. You think you do, but you don't. It will create chaos. University of Texas. Another Supreme Court district things based off of how many black people are in them. That's so stupid. Court case regarding affirmative action in a college. Shelby County versus Holder. A Supreme Court case concerning preclarance or the right of the federal government to approve of voting law changes of certain states that had a history of racial discrimination, i.e. the south. This one was important because it resulted in a landmark decision that allowed historically racially discriminant states in the South to [ __ ] with voter ID laws, removing Don't tell me this is somebody that thinks voter ID laws are racist, right? If voter ID laws are racist, is it racist to buy alcohol? I'm sorry, but if you're too stupid to get an ID, I don't care what skin color you are. I don't want you to vote. I don't. And it's better for everybody that you don't. The most effective protection against racial voter suppression. Doesn't that I think that we should if you can't get an ID, you are so stupid that you should not even be allowed to make decisions for yourself. Period. You shouldn't. Like I I I know this isn't like a politically correct thing to say, but anybody that's unable to get an ID for themselves and is able to do that, they are so stupid and so incompetent that this person is completely not a functional adult. You are not a functional adult in any capacity. Everybody knows where the DMV is. Everybody knows how to get identification. If you can't get identification, you are a totally dysfunctional invalid. And you should not be having any decision on who's the president. Duh. Of course not. Like what are we talking about? That sound familiar? The legacy of Edward Blum. That champion patriot American. I know. Equality must suck, huh? That's this guy's entire goal to roll back civil rights protections, especially civil rights protections. This is another another reframing of preferential institutional treatment that's based off of race. No. Those that affect or benefit black people. Just like I pointed out in my last video, it's a strange coincidence everything Zach promotes is backed by some white guy whose life goal is to [ __ ] on black people. Are they right or not? I have never understood the notion that we could continue to focus on race in order to get over race. Um I've never understood that that we have to continue to identify us in a you know the to be race conscious in order not to be race conscious. I think that's attributed something from Justice Blackman. And I I just don't I I was in the seminary as I note in my memoirs. I was the only black kid in my seminary in Savannah in 1965 to 67 playing on a hard mode and one of two in 1964 to 65. So you could see the world hadn't changed in Savannah. At that time. Yeah. And what I found in getting along with the white classmates is to look at them not as white kids or as different, but as kids to look at people as human beings and treat them as human beings. Whoa. Whoa. They're good ones. They're bad ones. They're tall. They're short. Whoa. There's some There's some less flawed, some who are flawed, some less flawed. Wait a minute. But it need Wait a minute. So, you're supposed to judge people off of their personality rather than their race. Oh my, this is crazy. Has anybody said this before? The forbidden strategy. I know these people don't want to do that. They don't want to do that and they want to act like victims while they're simultaneously claiming advantages. This is what it is. These people are fundamental and just thorough racists. And this is the problem that happens is that they are not interested in creating a better disparity between they're they're not interested in creating opportunities. They're interested in creating outcomes. And to them, an outcome that doesn't put them in a preferential position is an unfair outcome because they've just invented So this is why Zach said white and Asian-Americans in his tweet because like Yeah. Because it's factually true. most people that promote white supremacist rhetoric. He's weaponizing Asian people against black and Hispanic people in the United States. Well, I would say that Asian people are having the admissions process weaponized against them because they're not being accepted when they should be. Like I don't think it's really me. I I think I identifying this is just a fact. Yeah, it's pretty obvious. This is a very common tactic known as the model minority myth. Yeah, they are a model minority. It's a fact. It's not a myth. It's a fact. Look at crime rates. Look at success rates. Look at income and everything. Yeah. I I wish everybody that came here acted like that. It's not a myth. It's a fact. Like this. This is the problem is that we have so much of this institutional capture that's been done by people that are ideologically inclined and also racist that we've taken things like for example uh replacement migration and then we've turned it into uh you know like some sort of conspiracy theory that you can't acknowledge that this is happening and then we've did the model minority myth. It's not a myth, it's a reality. It's true. I'm using them as example. You're exactly right. That's the reason why Zack nor Edward Blum give a flying [ __ ] about Asian people. Asians are just a pawn in their game. A game that when that game is won will be turned against Asians. And un Why is it so hard for these people to understand the concept of just being able to compete on an even playing field? And if you're not successful on that even playing field, you obviously are a failure. These people constantly want to blame institutions and other forms of a lack of preferential treatment for the outcomes that they don't want because they're racist. Yeah. They're they're literally racist. This is what I think is very funny is that and and this is one of the things that I think that now as this kind of stuff and and also this is the re the reason why I talk about this a lot is because I know almost nobody else will talk about this and if they are talking about it they're either completely racist in one direction or another and I think that I'm one of the only people that talks about this in a way that is fair. I think it's very obvious that there are disadvantages that black people have had historically. I think that's obviously true, but the reality also is that right now those advantages in some cases do have ripple effects, but they can be better accommodated for by focusing on what the effects actually are rather than the race of the people that are experiencing them. Because a lot of people experience poverty, not just black people, there are poor Asian people as well. There are poor Jews, there are poor white people. So when your when when your mode of attack and your mode of approach is not to attack the problem but to attack a corollary like race, it's because you're literally a racist. That's the reason why. It's obvious. Fortunately, some of them are too [ __ ] stupid to recognize that. Oh. Oh, Asians are stupid. Look at this guy. Oh, I wonder I wonder if Martin Luther King, you know, judged me not by my by the by what was it my skin color, but by the contents of my character. Yeah, I wonder if that I I wonder if hiring people and granting them college admissions based off of their skin color is following that ideology. Ah jeez, guys, I really wonder. And uh that's it's refreshing to see more people waking up to the truth. as much as what known as black history has created lies propaganda denying to remite history opportunistic blacks preferential treatment and exploit well-meaning Americans. Yeah. Okay. So, this is some other thing. It's not even related to it at all. So, this person also is they they're also like negative against Asians as well. So, you see like the animosity here that that's that's coming out really for no reason. What is this? I want to be free. I want You're not free. You're not, bro. You're not free. Slavery is still there. That's right. Black and Asians are That's right. There's one guy with a photo. So true, bro. So true. It's really sad to see people like this that think that they're smart. The dude's actually racist. Let me pull this up. Let's see it. It's not uh I'm not. It's irrelevant. The point is this is the guy I remember this. Yes, this is the guy that made the video about me. They're literally racist. So whenever they're accusing me of being racist, they're actually racist. And the reason why is because I'm cutting into their preferential treatment that plays into their biases. Objectively, the is white people who started World War I. We can discuss Asians or we can discuss the topic at hand. We're not going to do both. The claim was that white people are the most destructive race. Is this not a true claim? White people are a world minority, yet they commit the most atrocities per capita. Who won't like that one? Really? Well, what about MAU? And uh no, these groups show white people commit rape more than the other groups combined. Do you want to know the reason why rape is being uh this is going to be maybe a spicy [ __ ] take here, but the reason why rape is being seen by white people more? It's because in a lot of places in Africa, it's not against the law. Sorry, buddy. Reality doesn't care about your feelings. and the age and the days of being a racist black person trying to advocate for preferential treatment while simultaneously playing the victim card. They've come to an end. We're getting rid of all of these advantages and you're going to have to compete on an even playing field because just like Martin Luther King said, you shouldn't be judged on your skin color but on the contents of your character. And for people like this that are complete morons, losers, and that have nothing to add to the world of any value, that's very scary for them because they know that they would end up losing. And I'm black. I grew up poor, single mother household, and I'm not a criminal. Uh, wait, wait a minute. Wait a minute. We have a black person in chat that you grew up in a single household and you you're not Wait a minute. So, you didn't rob the CVS. Oh, somebody better tell him about this. Holy [ __ ] Really? How did this Wait, how did this happen? Oh my god. Jesus Christ. These people are so stupid. It's sad. It's genuinely sad what these people are doing. Oh my god.