Iran has no idea what's coming..
Chapters8
Iran replies to the US proposal via mediators, focusing on ending the war and securing Hormuz, with no mention of nuclear issues in the initial response.
Asmongold TV weighs Iran tensions, Trump’s denuclearization push, and the Hormuz chokepoint with a mix of analysis, sourcing, and fringe commentary.
Summary
Asmongold TV dives into the latest chatter around Iran, the U.S. peace proposal, and the fragile dynamics in the Persian Gulf. The host cites Trey Yanks reporting from Tel Aviv, noting Iran’s initial response centers on ending the war and securing the Strait of Hormuz, with little emphasis on Iran’s nuclear program. The discussion spins through potential naval escalations, the role of Pakistani mediators, and the broader regional picture including Israel’s stance and Iran’s proxies like Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis. The panel debates what a “win” for President Trump would look like, emphasizing that he wants a durable denial of a nuclear capability and the removal of enriched uranium from Iran. They reference a Wall Street Journal report about Iran proposing a phased ceasefire, a gradual Hormuz reopening, and diluted uranium to third countries. Throughout, the conversation oscillates between skepticism about negotiation leverage and advocacy for a hard line, with the host arguing that diplomacy may be a strategic delay tactic used by adversaries. The stream also touches on broader media dynamics, noting how some creators might shift coverage depending on regime changes in Iran. Overall, the video blends commentary, cited quotes, and live reactions to live developments in a rapidly evolving crisis.
Key Takeaways
- Iran’s initial response reportedly focuses on ending the war and securing the Strait of Hormuz, with less emphasis on the nuclear issue.
- President Trump’s stated objective is to ensure that Iran never has a nuclear weapon and to remove highly enriched uranium from Iran.
- Iran reportedly proposes an end to fighting, a gradual reopening of Hormuz, and uranium dilution to a third country, per Wall Street Journal reporting.
- Israeli officials and advisers reportedly view Trump as clear-eyed about threats from Gaza and Iran’s proxies, shaping regional expectations.
- A deal would need more than a war-end; the administration seeks dismantling enrichment facilities and a verifiable denuclearization to be considered a success.
- The discussion acknowledges the complexity of governance in Iran and questions the feasibility of long-term negotiated constraints in the face of existential threats.
- The debate highlights the risk that diplomacy may serve as a temporary pause before renewed conflict, depending on incentives and enforcement.
Who Is This For?
Essential viewing for followers of U.S.-Iran diplomacy and Middle East security who want a blunt, streamer-led synthesis of live developments, propaganda angles, and on-the-ground analysis.
Notable Quotes
""Iran has responded to the US peace proposal to end the war, giving their response to Pakistani mediators.""
—Cites the reported mediation process and Iran’s initial public response.
""The president seems quite cleareyed on what the objective is of operation epic fury and that is to ensure that Iran never has a nuclear weapon.""
—Frames Trump’s stated objective and the strategic goal of denuclearization.
""If the Iranian response is only focused on ending the war and looking at the Strait of Hormuz... it’s not going to be enough.""
—Defines what would constitute a satisfactory outcome for a deal.
""They have the capability to create 11 nuclear bombs""
—Reference to negotiations and Iran’s nuclear potential used in persuasion.
""The Iranians came to the negotiating table and they told US special envoy Steve Wickoff that they had enough highly enriched uranium""
—Cites a specific claim used to illustrate Iran’s nuclear posture in talks.
Questions This Video Answers
- What are the latest U.S.-Iran negotiation terms regarding uranium enrichment and the Strait of Hormuz?
- How would a phased nuclear deal with Iran differ from a full denuclearization agreement?
- What role do Pakistani mediators play in the Iran-U.S. talks?
- What happens if Iran refuses to denuclearize—could a war resume in the region?
- How does Israel view President Trump's approach to Iran and Gaza in these negotiations?
Iran-US relationsStrait of HormuzNuclear negotiationsIranian proxiesIsrael-Iran relationsTrey Yanks reportWall Street Journal Iran proposalPakistan mediators
Full Transcript
Here's Iran has responded to President Trump's proposal to res um Yeah, I saw that there was like a big update about the Iran war. Like I I don't know if there if this is like actually something substantial or not. I feel like every single time that I hear that it seems like, oh wow, this is some kind of crazy new thing and then it turns out to just be [ __ ] But um yeah, I don't know what this is. Patch notes. Yeah, exactly. What is it saying? Great to chief foreign correspondent Trey Yanks. He is live in Tel Aviv with the latest.
Trey, tell us what is happening in this high stakes negotiation and appeal to Iran. Yeah, guys, good morning. Reports indicate that Iran has responded to the US peace proposal to end the war, giving their response to Pakistani mediators. Now, initial reports in Iranian state media indicate their response focuses on ending the war and ensuring security in the Strait of Hormuz. There is no mention of Iran's nuclear program, a key agenda item for the Trump administration. Now, this comes as we're also tracking reports of a cargo ship that was targeted off the coast of Qatar earlier today.
We understand an unknown projectile hit the vessel that was 23 nautical miles northeast of Doha. That according to the UK maritime agency, the explosion caused a small fire that is now under control according to reports. The incident though highlighting the latest in a series of events in the Persian Gulf and Straight of Hormuz that show Iran is testing the fragile ceasefire. I bet they are. From our perspective, a naval blockade is considered a military act and a military act receives a military response. Let them understand this. From now on, they should assign several additional escorts to their destroyers so that if one of them starts sinking, they can at least rescue and evacuate their naval forces.
Y'all really like, y'all really on this? Come on, guys. With the region waiting to see the details of this Iranian response, President Trump shared a series of AI images overnight depicting Iran's navy at the bottom of the sea. President Trump was asked over the weekend about the expected Iranian response, saying this. You think they're slow rolling it? You think they're intentionally slow rolling the process? We'll find out. I don't know. Yeah, he's not going to say that. This hour, we're also tracking developments of Iranian drones over both the UA. You think nuking Iran's a viable solution?
No, it wouldn't work. And Kuwait, an indication Iran is continuing its attacks against Gulf countries, guys. Mhm. Yeah. Trey, so this response coming uh do we know who is sending this? Is this coming from uh Kami or uh parliament? Who's sending this message? What can you tell us about what's happening inside Iran? It's worth trying. No, no, I wouldn't do that. What's interesting is late last week, Iranian President Masud Peskin indicated for the first time publicly that he had met directly for more than two hours with Iran's new Supreme Leader Mustaki. And there was also an interesting post from state media this morning.
I don't even believe that guy's alive up for you. from a top reporter inside of Iran saying Lieutenant General Abdullahi in a meeting with his eminence Ayatah say Mustaba presented a report on the preparedness of Iran's armed forces encompassing the army the IRGC law enforcement security and border guard forces the ministry of defense and the heroic besiege this is an indication that the Iranians are trying to signal that if this response to the mediators in Pakistan and ultimately the Trump administ ministration is not sufficient that they are prepared if this leads to a resumption of the bombing campaign which would also see an increase of attacks by Iranian forces and so Iran is signaling that they are prepared to return to war.
The question now is what was in this response presented to Pakistani mediators and whether or not it is going to address the key issue that President Trump cares about and that is ensuring that Iran never has a nuclear weapon. Yeah, duh. Of course. Let me ask you about the Israeli response obviously because we're just getting Iran never having a nuclear weapon isn't really the problem. Iran's government is the problem. And even if Iran doesn't have a nuclear weapon, they're still an existential threat. I don't even agree with the framing of this. Like obviously they shouldn't have a nuke, but they shouldn't have anything else either.
They shouldn't have an air force. They shouldn't have missiles. They shouldn't have tanks. They shouldn't be alive. That's what I think. information that it was sent to Pakistani mediators. They may not have all the information. Uh what if anything can you tell us about what's coming from BB Netanyahu and his team? Uh oh. The Israelis are bracing for the reality that if these negotiated settlement attempts fail, the region could imminently return to war, which would include missile fire toward Israel. But we're also tracking other developments as it relates to Iranian proxies across the region like the Houthis, Hezbollah, and Hamas.
And I spoke earlier today with a senior adviser to Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin [ __ ] terrorist Michael Eisenberg who said this about efforts to disarm Hamas inside Gaza. Oh, here we go. I'm very optimistic about President Trump and the Board of Peace. I think they are the first administration and the first institution that very clearly sees Hamas for who they are and they very clearly assess the situation for what it is. Kamas rule they are unrepentant non-compliant terrorists who we gave a chance to bring along the rest of the world and the mediators. They also see that Gaza without a total remake without getting rid of Hamas without getting rid of the weapons.
Gaza will never like they will never stop bombing Gaza people will never stop getting killed in Gaza until Hamas is totally gone. There's never going to be a universe where Hamas still exists and the people in Gaza are safe. It's just not going to happen. It's never going to provide a better life for the people. So obvious. Yeah. Of course. The bottom line here is that advisers to Israel's prime minister indicate they believe in President Trump. They think he is cleareyed when it comes to not only the threats from inside Gaza, but also from Iran's largest proxy, Hezbollah, in southern Lebanon and of course from the Iranian regime.
I don't know, guys. You know, Trey, it's very clear that President Trump wants to get what he wants out of Iran, which is for them to denuclearize, but also wants to wrap this up. There are a lot of dem Even if they say they're going to denuclearize, they're just going to say that and then start doing it again. Like, I I don't know why anybody like it. It's crazy that we're even like, how is it that so many people can be so stupid? They just say that because they know that's what you want to hear.
They tell you what you want to hear, so you allow them to continue consolidating resources in the back end. Like that's what they're going to do. There's never going to be a point where you're going to be able to make a deal with these people and everybody's like, "Oh, okay. Well, now let's follow the rules." They're not going to do that. It's almost like they lie endlessly. Yeah. They they use negotiations as a military strategy. Negotiations are used as a stop gap in order for them to hopefully prolong things, make them more financially problematic for us or in one way or another make it more annoying.
That's the reason why ICIC concerns he must be thinking about um we've been talking earlier the the the map I'll look at after this move more in their favor favor in terms of seats, but I think he would definitely like to see gas prices. Also, by the way, if it if the Iranian government falls and they get rid of the Iran government, like and the IRGC, if this does happen, I want you guys to pay attention to how many creators and how many people start talking about these topics very differently and maybe some creators stop making content around these topics entirely, because I think there's going to be a lot of them.
something that um the country would like as well. So what is the the the indication that you're getting from the administration? I know couple weeks ago you were on the phone with the president. I know you have a lot of sources. How anxious are they to get this deal done and how much does the upcoming trip to China play into that? It's a great question. And I've talked to President Trump a number of times throughout this war and during a very challenging time for the region and the president seems quite cleareyed on what the objective is of operation epic fury and that is to ensure that Iran never has a nuclear weapon.
Because when we think back to the negotiations that were happening before this operation began, the Iranians came to the negotiating table and they told US special envoy Steve Wickoff that they had enough highlyenriched uranium to create 11 nuclear bombs. This was a signal to President Trump that a not only were the Iranians prepared to pursue a nuclear weapon, but b they had the capability to do so. And so the president has very much presented this to the world and especially the American people as a trade-off understanding that there may be a a challenging moment that could see a brief increase in energy prices in the price of fuel.
But ultimately, shit's going to be more expensive because the war obviously, but shit's going to be way more expensive if Iran has a nuclear weapon and they're able to use that nuclear capability to exercise power diplomatically in the future. It's going to be a lot worse. This would lead to Iran not having a nuclear weapon that wouldn't just allies across the region like Israel, but also US forces and allies in Europe. and in the future possibly the United States given Iran's efforts to increase the range of their ballistic missile program. And so the takeaway here is that the president is patient and Israeli officials I spoke with an intelligence official late last week who said that the president's patience the reason why people don't understand it is because they're stupid.
They're stupid. They they don't understand the concept of um like most people can only think 15 minutes in front of themselves. Not most people, but a lot of people can. So they're not able to conceptualize other realities and like future outcomes. So because you have a lot of people that are not able to conceptualize a future outcome or like a possible uh secondary effect, those people are the main ones that are the ones freaking out about it. They can't think bigger picture. Yeah. And and also like you shouldn't be mad at them, right? I mean they're literally just not able to do that.
It's like they're stupid. Like you don't get mad at a dog cuz they can't use a calculator, right? Like these people are just dumb. And because they're so stupid, they're not able to think this way. It's not even their fault. Is a card that he had at the table with Iran because the Iranians thought that President Trump would back down and ultimately he entered into project freedom. He was able to block Iran's ports and put new pressure economically on the regime that is forcing the Iranians to respond to these efforts of peace by the Trump administration.
It's pretty obvious that's what's happening. What would a deal have to entail or include in order for this to be a win and enough for President Trump to to end this? The president has indicated he does not want a partial deal. And so if the Iranian response is only focused on ending the war and looking at the straight of Hormuz and the traffic through this critical waterway, it's not going to be enough. According to President Trump, he wants to address the nuclear threat from the Iranian regime. And that means getting out the already enriched uranium.
It's not about the nuclear threat because again, like why get rid of the cookies? You should be getting rid of the cookie factory. If you have a government that's trying to get trying to make nuclear bombs, like we just bombed the [ __ ] out of them, we killed their leader, they're not going to just turn around and say, "Okay, guys, I guess we give up." The reason why, for example, Japan gave up in World War II, is cuz they got nuked twice and they were going to get attacked by like what, Soviet Russia or something like that, too.
that they were facing an existential annihilation, like an existential extinction event. That's the reason why you're not going to get these people to give up with diplomacy. It's not going to happen. What the president refers to as nuclear dust that is buried deep underground in the operation midnight hammer that occurred last summer, that enriched uranium is still there. also ensuring that the facilities to enrich uranium are dismantled and then ultimately getting that enriched uranium out of Iran and pledging that the Iranians will never resume a military nuclear program. And these are key agenda items for the Trump administration and his top negotiators.
If they go through with that, I will be so mad. Jared Kushner and Steve Wickoff. We do know over the weekend that Secretary of State Rubio along with special envoy Wickoff met with the Qatari prime minister in Miami. They are working with regional partners to ensure that there is a fullcourt press putting this pressure on the Iranian regime understanding that Iran has two options here according to President Trump. Either they sign on the dotted line or the war is going to resume. All right, Trey Yanks, great update. Thank you so much for that. Thanks, buddy.
I think all they need to do is just keep assassinating the leadership. That's what I would keep doing if I was them. And then eventually, you know, you're going to roll the dice enough times to where you run out of people that want to be uh martyrs and zealots. That's what I would say. Um I think that's clearly what's going to happen. And uh let me go back. Oh, look. So Trump Trump did respond to this. Is that right? Let me take a look at it and find it. The radical left Democrats must fail. Yes, obviously.
I have just read the response from Iran's so-called quote representatives. I don't like it. Totally unacceptable. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Oh, that that's literally it. He doesn't like it. Okay. So, it's not going to happen. All right. Well, there we go. And we don't negotiate with terrorists. Yeah, I think so. And I wish we had dealt with Hormuse quickly. That would have been finished now if we had. I mean, I don't think you can easily deal with a waterway that's been, you know, like reinforced with tons of people for literally [ __ ] uh for years, right?
Decades they've been doing this. Let me see if there's any more of this going on. But I feel like that's basically it. You'll get bombed again. Enjoy. Yeah. Is this Yeah. But we do have some breaking news tonight being reported by the Wall Street Journal, citing people familiar with the response from Iran to the US proposal. And here are some of the highlights. Iran is proposing an end to the fighting and a gradual reopening of the straight of Hormuz. Uh the US must uh lift its blockade of Iranian ports, say the Iranians. Nuclear issues to be negotiated over the next 30 days.
Another stipulation. Also Iran proposing to have some of its highlyenriched uranium diluted the rest to a third country. And also Iran I'm curious how they still block the straight. So it's really simple. They're doing it through like they're not really there's not like a naval blockade like in a video game for example. What they have is they put a bunch of mines in international waters and they're just trying to fire missiles at boats that are going over there. It's almost impossible to go through and stop every single missile, every single mine, and every single thing that happens.
And on top of that, here's another component is that I bet if a lot of those ships went through, cuz other ships have gone through the straight of Hormuz, and they haven't gotten attacked. It's not like every single ship goes through the straight of Hormuz and gets attacked. So why is it that some of them get attacked and some of them don't? Well, it's because they don't have the resources to hit every single one of them. So what ends up happening is that the like imagine you're the guy that owns the ship. You're the guy that is in charge of the ship and you have the probability that oh my god maybe they're going to blow up my one in [ __ ] uh you know my my $ 1.5 billion ship and cause me four like let's say $200 million in repairs.
Is that worth sitting in the straight of Hormuz or the the you know the bay there? Is it worth sitting there or, you know, not going into that in order to avoid a potential $2 million loss? It obviously is, right? It's obviously the right decision. So, them saying that they're shutting it down, it's not like they turned it off like a highway gets closed. It's that imagine somebody put a bunch of nails on the highway and you have billion-dollar tires and you don't want to run them over on accident. That's basically what's happening. So, whenever they're saying they're shutting it down, this is a bit of a misunderstanding.
China's benefiting from this. I don't think that they really are. And uh yeah, wrong again. What is this here? Uh what's wrong about this? Let me let me see what this is. What am I wrong about? What What am I wrong about? You You've been disagreeing for a while. You've been telling me I'm wrong. Now, now let's let's find out why. All right. Okay. I'm chat. All right. We We'll give him a minute. throwaway account probably. Yeah, it could be. It's not about mines. What they have is mount in a strain and right by the coast they have drones and missiles ready to fire on the ships.
Well, yeah, of course. Like I didn't say it was only mines. I said it was mines then also missiles. Didn't I didn't I say that? I'm pretty sure I said that. I'm like 95% sure I said that. Let me see here. Here's the English version. Twitchified. Hormuz is literally a spawn trap for tankers. Iran doesn't need to sink everything. They just spam cheap sea mines and drones until insurance rates go up. That's literally what I said. No shipping country is going to gamble and one Shahhead drone can wipe out their profit. That I I I don't even understand like you you got me.
You're you're literally repeating what I said. Where are these people coming from? Uh chat GPT response. That's an AI summary. Well, it should have been better. And I wonder why the AI summary is exactly what I think. I wonder why. Account created on the same day it follows you over 99 messages. It's insane. Well, that's the last one. So, yeah, I'm glad to see that. And yeah, I mean, that's the reason why watching the stream muted, by the way. He was an expert in naval war. Yeah, some of the people that make these arguments are just so dumb.
Like, and what I found is that the majority of the people that make the arguments are generally people that actually just support Iran and they're not actually like they're cosplaying as if they're like a conscientious objector, but it's actually just somebody that's like a terror supporter. That's really about it. We've discussed this before. It's because the uh you're autistically AI. No, I had a I had a girl tell me that she talking with me was like uh you know you would be able to It's basically like I gave her the same answers that chat GPT gave her.
I don't know what to say, right? I I don't. And uh yeah, woman, I know. I know. Huge problem. I'm sorry I've been cheating on you guys, but uh not at least it's it's not in that way, but like I was just talking to somebody. It's a friend of mine. But like, yeah, tell you're too smart for your own good. I guess you're a robot. Oh, I think I I I try to be logical. That's all it is. I just try to be logical. Iran has been playing games with the US for 40 Oh, Iran has been playing games with the US for too long.
Again, hundreds of billions of dollars, billions of dollars in green cash. Okay. Yeah, this is just more [ __ ] him talking about it. I think that he's got to just keep bombing them. Like, just keep going after their leadership over and over and over and eventually they're going to run out of people. I think that's really what's going to happen and uh hopefully hopefully that's what happens but we'll see what happens. I don't know. And he says he uh as he loses the war on Iran, I don't think I if anybody thinks that America is losing the war, you have been spending too much time on like Twitter listening to, you know, like some third world analysis or something like that.
That's absolutely not the case. You have common knowledge, common sense. Yeah, it's pretty obvious. And uh seriously, yeah, sure. Iran civil war in the future. I think that's probably like that's a best case scenario. I'll be honest, it definitely is. It's a best case scenario to see that
More from Asmongold TV
Get daily recaps from
Asmongold TV
AI-powered summaries delivered to your inbox. Save hours every week while staying fully informed.



