The UK government is evil
Chapters8
Describes a 15 year old girl being raped by two Afghan asylum seekers in a secluded area, with bystanders passing by and the victim recording distressing pleas.
Asmongold analyzes a horrific UK crime case to argue that asylum policies inadequately vet arrivals and fuel public risk, urging stricter controls and accountability.
Summary
Asmongold, hosting on Asmongold TV, dives into a brutal UK case involving two Afghan asylum seekers who assaulted a 15-year-old girl. He emphasizes transparency by recounting court details, including the victim’s pleas for help and the bystander inaction captured in recordings. The discussion broadens to critique migration vetting processes, age assessments, and the lack of clear identity information for offenders. He weaves in personal outrage about PTSD and the long-term harm to victims and families, arguing that the current system often compounds trauma. Various political angles surface, from critiques of the Human Rights Act to calls for stronger immigration controls and even extreme counterarguments about reversing migration. Throughout, Asmongold questions the balance between human rights and public safety, repeatedly tying policy failures to real-world violence against women. He contrasts UK experiences with American debates on sovereignty, borders, and enforcement, prompting viewers to consider what “acting in the best interest” of citizens should look like. The video closes with a provocative, controversial standoff about what measures would be acceptable to prevent such crimes, highlighting the ethical tension between compassion and protection.
Key Takeaways
- Two Afghan asylum seekers were accused of raping a 15-year-old girl, with bystanders failing to intervene as recorded in court proceedings.
- Advocates argue that lack of robust age verification and unclear offender identities undermine public safety and victim support.
- Public and political reactions in the clip veer toward debating the Human Rights Act and migration policy as levers to reduce crime.
- The host links PTSD and family trauma to migrant-related crime, suggesting policy failures extend beyond individual incidents.
- Some speakers urge drastic measures, including stricter asylum processing and deportation of offenders, while others warn against broad generalizations about entire migrant groups.
- Historical parallels (e.g., references to American deportation and Eisenhower-era policy) are invoked to frame today’s immigration debate as a long-running power struggle.
- The dialogue underscores the ethical tension between protecting citizens and upholding human rights for migrants and victims alike.
Who Is This For?
Essentials viewers who want a blunt, policy-centered take on immigration, crime, and national security debates, especially fans of Asmongold who seek provocative, no-nonsense commentary. This is for those who want to understand how online discourse can shape opinions on asylum policy and public safety.
Notable Quotes
""Two Afghan asylum seekers dragged a 15year-old girl into a secluded area of woodland and raped her.""
—Foundation of the discussion: the central crime being examined.
""We cannot have groups of random, bored, culturally incompatible men wandering around towns and villages""
—Representative line used to argue for stricter containment and vetting.
""The PTSD that one of these interactions creates in a person is like it it's massively damaging""
—Highlighting long-term impact on victims and families.
""If something isn't in the best interest of our native citizens, then we should not do it. Period. Full stop.""
—Core stance on prioritizing citizens’ safety over unrestricted migration.
""We should only act in the best interest of our citizens""
—Closing sentiment anchoring the speaker’s policy position.
Questions This Video Answers
- How do UK asylum policies handle age verification for detainees and migrants?
- Should Human Rights Act considerations override public safety concerns in immigration policy?
- What are the arguments for and against deporting asylum seekers who commit crimes?
- How reliable are witness reports and bystander interventions in high-profile crimes in the UK?
- What historical examples are used to frame current immigration debates in the UK and US?
UK immigration policyAsylum seekersRotherham referenceHuman Rights ActAge assessmentPublic safety and traumaDebate on deportationEisenhower and US policyVetting and identity verification
Full Transcript
this horrific rape in Lamington because some of the details here are absolutely appalling and I'm sharing them with you um for full transparency about what happened in that case. But I also give a warning before I do about some of them. Two Afghan asylum seekers dragged a 15year-old girl into a secluded area of woodland and raped her. The girl So two Afghanistan Okay, got it. Yeah. cried out for help. Indeed, she managed to record her begging of a passing woman. At one point, a woman is heard asking the 15-year-old, "Are you all right?" The girl replies, "No, help me.
Please help me. So many people have walked past me. I want to go home. Please, please help me. Help me. They are going to rape me." So, everybody just basically just let this Oh my god, that's sick. the girl who can't be named um because she is entitled to anonymity. Uh the court was told eventually managed to get away and recorded several selfie type videos demonstrating what they say was extreme distress, crying and hyperventilating. In a video after the ordeal, she could be heard sobbing, "Oh my god, I've just got effing kidnapped. I thought I was going to be dead.
Every single one of these people are driving past me. Help me, someone. Please, please help me. Why is no one helping me? Please, someone. Her mother said in a victim impact statement, "We have watched our vibrant, happy, and confident daughter shrink down and suffer from anxiety so bad that she's often physically sick." I'm glad that people are talking more about this because the PTSD that one of these interactions creates in a person is like it it's massively damaging. And for some people, the effects of that turn out to be worse than what even happened to them.
It's not even a it's not because they end up killing themselves over it. Like they they it [ __ ] up their entire life. Yeah. It's lifealtering. Exactly. And especially keep in mind this is, you know, you're 15 years old, right? I mean, this isn't a you know, like a 33y old woman having this happen. This is like a this is a child having this happen. This has affected every aspect of her life. Something broke in all of us that day. Yeah, I bet the two Afghans who were living there and then also like that's another thing too is that there's the there's the the family PTSD, right?
where it's like not only are you like let me give you an example of like how maybe you guys might be able to relate to this is that have you ever had like a parent that or like somebody who was older that you were looking after that had something bad happen to them like they fell down they got sick or something like that happened and you weren't there like you tried to call them they didn't pick up the phone and so like it stressed you out you came over and there's something wrong think about how that probably negatively affected you in the future right and like now you're thinking about that now you're stressed out about that So now every time that this family probably calls the daughter, she's not at home.
Like now they're stressed out about that too, right? So like you people don't understand the AoE damage that the PTSD from a negative reaction like this will cause. It's horrifying. Hotel having just arrived by boat have been sentenced to 10 and 9 years in prison. The Telegraph reports that Jan Janz turns 18 in less than a month and will be automatically deported after serving his sentence, but the court heard that his date of birth was unknown. So, an age assessment has been carried out by specialists. So, I wonder then how we know that he turns 18 in a month if we don't actually know this this individual's date of birth.
And therein lies a very very big part of a very very big problem. We have no idea who these people are. We we barely know where they come from. Here's a good way to look at it. Any of the people that think that this is okay, would you be okay with removing and getting rid of the sex offender list? So basically like you don't have to register for being a sex offender. You don't have to do anything, you know, like that at all. And so like yeah, there's there's no reason. So nobody would say that they are in favor of removing the sex offender list, right?
Because well, what if a sex offender like I don't want to have a sex offender living near me? They are. Not all of them. And here's another thing. Many people on the sex offender list don't reaffend. They don't. They commit a crime. They do something really bad. and they never do something bad like that ever again, but they're still on the sex offender list. Not allowing people to remove these, you know, like migrants that are totally unvetted is the effectively the same thing as just getting rid of the sex offender list. You guys, you guys see where I'm coming from with this?
and and the rage that I feel about this story and the rage that you feel about this story, this this kind of actually I find genuinely barely containable rage um leads to perhaps a desire to bring in a few of the more kind of Trumpian ends of the ideas about what should happen next. And I would quite candid with you quite a few of those ideas have flickered through my mind. And I I don't think that's the Trumpian. You don't need the Trumpian ideas. It's not good enough. See, don't ever think that that's enough. It's not.
The last 24 hours, but I I am trying extremely hard not to let the jerk in knee-jerk win. Yeah. However, it's not a knee-jerk. It's the reality. It's common sense reality. as the people of Crobra where 600 men are about to be deposited at an old army camp. Yeah. As they set up a patrol group of local residents around the old barracks there. Uh surely that has to be an absolute minimum now for any place housing large numbers of asylum seeking men. We we cannot have groups of random, bored, culturally incompatible men wandering around towns and villages of places unfortunate enough to be burdened with this [ __ ] based.
And and also I I completely disagree with this. I think that just the the notion that you need to have an entire police enforcement mechanism to make sure that these people don't rape your kids. Uh I think that that should tell you something like maybe they shouldn't be here. Like maybe if you need Oh well guys, I think we need an enforcement mechanism that makes it to where all of the rapists are being regulated. Well, yeah. Why do you even have it? Like I mean think about the question why are they even here in the first place if you need to have a separate police system now to regulate and like basically be a countermeasure for just them being in the country period.
Think like who do you you need to do this for regular British citizens then why like think about how ridiculous this is. This is crazy. This is like saying I'm going to hit myself in the head with a hammer so I need to start wearing a helmet. Well, here let me give you a good [ __ ] idea. Stop hitting yourself in the [ __ ] head with a hammer. You won't need the helmet. At a minimum, the rule has to be you cannot leave the facility you're being fed and watered in until we know who you are or until your claim has been processed.
Otherwise, the status quo carries on. And and I just don't see how anyone can conclude that that is the best way forward that we just let the same things we've always done keep happening with results being like this. So what is the response? Mhm. I'll give you one. This is the former prime minister Liz Truss. Now you say what you like about Liz Truss, but she was prime minister for a bit. It's annoying hearing you talk like this isn't in every way on purpose. I think it is on purpose and I think that they are doing it on purpose.
And my opinion on how to solve it would get me banned and what I think should happen to the people that were doing it. Like I'd get banned about my opinion. But you can expect that it is it's exactly what you think it is. She's just said these horrific crimes are happening daily in Britain. The whole system, including the mainstream media, is suppressing the truth. She says the Human Rights Act needs to be repealed. All migration from Afghanistan should be stopped. Is that That's too knee-jerk. Is that too knee-jerk? You No. Uh it's not enough.
uh not only should it be stopped, but you need to reverse migration. You need to look at all of the people that were brought here over the last 30 years and any of them with any criminal charges uh immediately remove them. A and any of them that are like net negative taxpayers, remove them and also seize all their assets and send them back to the country they came from. Like it it's not enough to just simply stop the problem because you still have the problem. Like stopping the problem is good, but you have to also reverse the damage.
Go back two generations, get the whole line. Yeah, I I would do I would do like let's say, oh, I was born here. Yeah. Well, I mean like I don't care. You've got to go back. Too bad. You're not supposed to be here. Your parents shouldn't have been here. You're not supposed to be here either. Can't and shouldn't judge the whole by the part. So we can't judge every person from Of course it doesn't matter. Like this language that you use is just silly Afghanistan on the basis of actions of in this case two people.
It's not two people. So that that that's too far for me. But I I'm again candidly that thoughts crossed my mind too. And and I can't I I think the I think the reality is that there is a small percentage of people that are immigrants from every single country that will integrate just fine. Uh whether they're from Somalia, Afghanistan, uh China, Russia, or anything. Like I'm sure that we have Somali immigrant Americans that have no problems and aren't causing any problems. I don't think we need to send them back. But we need to look at the ones that are doing things wrong and we need to go after them instead.
And the way that you do that is you set up high standards and then you simply hold people to those standards. That's the way you do it. Reason why I say I'm not sure that's going to work is it does judge the the the whole by the part and that that sort of isn't fair. The entire idea of it not being fair is a total inversion of the moral responsibility that you have to protect your country. your idea that it isn't fair. And so because you've come to the conclusion that it's not fair, the result of that is that women in your country get raped.
How is that fair to them? Your responsibility as a, you know, a person who's supposed to protect their country or do something to benefit other people is to act in a way that is in the best interest of other people that cannot act for themselves. And this is the big issue that happens is that you're thinking about like from my perspective, you should not even be considering what's fair to Afghanistan migrants. They should be lucky they're here in the first place. They shouldn't even be here anyway. So what's fair to them, even if it is unfair to them, who cares?
Who gives a [ __ ] Like the focus should be on your own people. Like you shouldn't even be thinking about them. But at a bare minimum, the idea that you would have um hundreds of people and even in the cases where we sort of have a better idea about who they are because they've been through the criminal system, still don't know how old this bloke is. Still don't really know how old he is. The idea that you would allow then hundreds and hundreds of people to be housed in areas and they're allowed to wander around and we have no idea who they are.
No. Cannot happen. Cannot be allowed to happen anymore. If if this case provides one response, it has to be that. But you're an immigrant, too. The Indians probably thought so as well. Yeah. And it didn't work. And look how they're doing. They're in reservations now, and their entire civilization is destroyed. We took up the we took over the whole country. Uh Indian-Americans, uh Native Americans represent like less than like probably 5% of the population. Um their uh culture is annihilated. their way of life is relegated to reservations and basically their entire existence is destroyed. So I think that you can look at Native Americans as a great example of what happens.
Do you want to have that happen to you? I don't. So do you not think the new immigrants will do the same thing to you, too? I think they will. That's the reason why I would try to prevent them from doing that. I I'm I'm confused by what your argument is. So, what's your what's your argument about this? Yeah. Let me let me pull this person up. I I I'll I'll listen to this. So, by the way, and I'm not an immigrant. Like, my my family came to America like 500 years ago. Like, whenever my family was in the country for 500 years, that I'm not an immigrant.
Sorry. Let's break this down. Okay, we're going to break it down. America didn't. Yes. 500 years ago, you [ __ ] I know. That's why my family fought in the Civil or sorry, the Revolutionary War to make it exist. Yeah, that's correct. I'm I'm glad that you recognize the math. That's accurate. You arrived from Europe. You stole the land from the natives. Exactly. We did. What makes the other immigrants worse than you? Nothing. Nothing makes them worse. I hold no moral superiority over them. I simply act in my own best interest and in the best interest of my country.
I don't I don't care about a moral argument. So might makes right. Yes, absolutely. That can be used against you too. Exactly. That's why I want to pre from come here. That's exactly right. I know it can be used against me. That's why I recognize the threat of it and that's why I want to prevent it from happening. Does that make sense? At least this person's responding. Uh, sure. Moral experience. New immigrants won't build a new civilization. Nor [ __ ] hole. That's not my problem. Even if they don't. Um, you're making it possible by allowing it.
Yeah, I know. That's why I think we should stop allowing it. I I agree and that's why we need to reverse it because I recognize that that threat and I I realize that it's real and that's the reason why I I would want to reverse it. That's my whole point. How many people live on a planet someone's going to go after you? Yeah, of course. That's why you have to have a gun and you have to be able to protect yourself. Yeah, definitely. I mean, that's why you have to have like you have national security, you have countermeasures, you have the CIA, you have the FBI, you have police department, you have home security, you have guns, you have the Second Amendment.
Yeah. Obviously, we have all those things because of what you're saying. Yeah. I I I I don't like I mean maybe maybe we're deprogramming, right? We've we got to deprogram people. So why are we in a circle like a squirrel? Better to not hurt people to begin with. Who Who are we hurting? Like I'm confused. Who am I hurting? Like I I'm I'm just so confused by this. Like I I think you're making a moral argument. USA is stealing resources from our countries. They should protect them better. That oil was promised to us 3,000 years ago.
I don't understand. Why do you think, here, let me ask you a question. Why do you think that those other countries don't come in to the United States and steal our resources? Why do you think they don't do that? I think this is an interesting question. It's not a moral argument. It's a fact. Yeah, I know. Why do Why did they not do that? You're probably 3,000 years ago. Are you Israel? Yes. So why do these countries not come to America and steal our resources? He's a goyam. There's a lot of goyam out there. I've honestly liked calling people goyam so much.
I'm beginning to believe that I might be Jewish. It really feels right for me to call people that. It does. I I feel so I I feel so comfortable calling people. Like it feels like I'm It feels like I finally It's like, you know, like if like a superhero movie where they finally hit you, they're like, "No, Super Boy, you can actually fly." Wait, I can as you came to America a couple hund years ago. Your parents. Okay, let me let me We're going to go back. The landing is stolen from the natives. You can't deny it.
I don't deny it. I embrace it and I respect it. Yes, that's correct. We stole it. And we killed them all. That's right. Yep. Now what? Okay. So I I'm confused. I What do we What are we talking about? Like Yeah, obviously conquered not stolen. What do you call it? So this is right. Morals deducted. I don't care what's right or not. It doesn't matter whether it's right or not. Like what are you what are you thinking about? Like what what's right or what's not right? I don't give a [ __ ] about Let me go back cuz you didn't answer my original question.
And the reason why is because it reveals that America is not unique in this mentality. Why is it that other countries don't come into America and steal our resources in the same way that we did to Middle Eastern and South American and African countries? Why is it that they're not coming into America and doing that? Why though? Because it is. That's why. There's a few reasons. What are the reasons? World Wars. Yeah, exactly. Because we killed them. What's the other reason? Petro dollar. Yeah. You know what the petro dollar is really backed up by? It's backed up by the US military.
Every value of America is at some level backed up directly by the United States military. The reason why these countries don't come in and loot and plunder America isn't because they respect America. It's because we'd kill them. That's the real reason. I if if we couldn't do that, they would take it over instantly. They would immediately do that. It's better by Saudi oil and other countries with the US deals of course. And it's in their best interest for them for us to do that because we help them and they make money off of us. That's right.
We have a partnership with them. That's correct. And I think that they're getting their money's worth out of that partnership because we're uh we're cleaning the board out of uh one of their biggest competitors, which is Iran. Iran is a major destabilizer there. And we're blowing them the [ __ ] up. It's cuz they're our boys. So, we're helping them out. The only reasonable person in US politics was Dwight Eisenhower warned the world about US military complex. You know what Dwight Eisenhower did before he did that? He won World War II. He beat the Nazis. He that's the that's the reason Dwight Eisenhower said like, "You know what?
You want you want to say I can't go to Area 51? All right, I'm going to show up tomorrow with the military, the whole army, and we're going to figure out what's in there." But you honestly think that Dwight Eisenhower would say that like that that really I mean let me ask you do you think Dwight Eisenhower would agree that like we live on stolen land from like the natives or like something like that and we need to like we need to give it back like what what are you trying to invoke him for? I mean he doesn't agree with what you're saying.
USSR beat the Nazis mate. Well we help France was not supposed to be in the UN table. Well they are. France is an ally. France are our OG allies. What are you talking about? Yeah, we sure help. That's why we had our tanks over there in Germany blowing them up, killing them. You're right. The USSR helped kill the Nazis. They did. So do we. Eisenhower was after World War II, bud. Hoover dropped the bomb. Well, of course he was after World War II because he was a general in World War II and then he became the president after that.
Like that's the way it worked. How y'all know? Like I damn, bro. Like really really guys? Like god damn. So anyway, German general saw their capitulation documents. They're very suppressed. Uh they were very suppressed that the French were there. Well, look, we're getting off topic, right? Like you're talking about World War II or something else. What my point is is that Dwight D. Ezenau would totally agree with what my perspective on this is. He totally would. And how do I know that? Because very clearly he won World War II. Like you have to be able to take drastic military action to solve this problem.
It's like he was letting in a million Somalians into America whenever he was president. Right? My dad campaigned for Dwight Eisenhower at five years old. They had a like little little thing. They said, "I like Ike." Okay? So like I know about this. I understand this probably better than you would imagine. So, but you talk about this like as much as you want, but here's really what it comes down to, and I'm going to explain this really quickly. No, we should not be acting in the best interest of people that are not our citizens. Would I agree with your point?
He's a true patriot of the United States. How many Somalians did Dwight Eisenhower let into the United States? How many? You realize Dwight D. Eisenhower was the president when we didn't have civil rights for black people, right? You understand that? Like I I'm sorry. He was the president during that time and when he left being the president, they still didn't have civil rights. So, this entire idea that like, oh, wow, this guy wouldn't agree with you. I'm losing brain cells over this. This person is trying to misunderstand you on purpose. I know that. And uh they are he made the interstates.
Well, he he made the interstates cuz he went over to uh Germany and he said how good they were doing it. They said, "Damn, they got this interstate thing going on. This is a good idea. We should do this over here." You're right. Dwight Dnau was the uh he made interstates 100%. And so anyway, there was so small immigrant [ __ ] back in the day. They stop moving the goalpost. Exactly. And there wouldn't be now if we had somebody like Dwight D. Eisenhower as the president who would never let this [ __ ] happen. Never. So anyway, let me go back to my original point, okay?
Cuz like we've been going on about this for a while. Um here's what my original point is. We should only act in the best interest of our citizens. If something isn't in the best interest of our native citizens, then we should not do it. Period. Full stop. Now, you can make a long-term second order effect argument that something would be in our best interest. Uh, and I I'm open to an argument like that, like, you know, for example, I said that Iran is our best interest is like a second or third order effect, right? Or like uh Venezuela, right?
But on a direct action, why would we allow like cuz this is really the question, why would you allow migrants to come into the country? Stop being silly. No, no, no. It's all right. We We're gonna wrap this up, though. like this is going on kind of for a while. So I I I want to wrap this up. Um so why would we want to have migrants come into the country that rape kids? Why why would we want to do that? Why would we want why would we want to let a single migrant into the country?
Like give me the give me the reason for why to go from zero to one. cuz she's hot. Okay. All right. Maybe like two or three then. Okay. Well, besides that, it's all right. Arrogant, disingenuous chatter. That's okay. You You would not want that to happen, but you're shifting a topic. What What do you think? What do you think the topic is? You still talking to this guy? I I know. I know. But what do you think that What is the topic to you? Eisenhower literally enacted one of the vastest deportation operations ever. You can't even name it because it's a slur.
I forgot about this. Uh-huh. Uh-huh. Right. A. And so, like, that's what it is. That's what it says. I I don't know what you want me to say. Millions of Mexicans had legally entered the country through joint immigration programs. was primarily a response from pressure from a broad coalition to remove them. Gave rise to the arrests and deportations. There it is. I forgot even all about You said the US can steal from other people's stuff. I said others can steal stuff from you. It's simply a truth you have to accept. Otherwise, you're a hypocrite. Yes.
Of course. Of course people can try and steal things from me. They do. What? Well, yeah. Obviously, that's the that's the reason why we have the government is to prevent people like Do you think people don't steal things out of a Walmart because they like Walmart? It's because they don't want to get put in jail. That's that's the reason why. Like, I've already explained this to you. It's the threat of force. They're scared of the consequences of it. That's the reason. Damn. How long is it? This is taking so long, bro. Like, god damn. You're an amazing circular logic.
I I'll let him respond one more time. One more time. One more time and we'll move on. So, basically bashing head against the wall. Same methods will be used against you. I know they will. And uh that's that's the reason why you have to suppress and oppress the people that might do that to you in an absolute state so they can never do that to you. That's exactly correct. That's my that that's my exact that's my exact point. So you have to shut them down and make it to where you are in such an advantageous position that they don't even think about doing that or they face complete and absolute obliteration.
That's the exact reason why we spend a trillion dollars on the military is so if somebody ever thinks about that we can blow them all up. Thank God for that. Somebody ideally the police I I don't know but somebody has to say I'm I'm afraid sir you cannot leave the hotel that you are being housed in until your claim has been processed cuz we don't know who you are. Yeah. I mean honestly you shouldn't even let them in. Like that's it. And I can see why British people are getting angry about this. I can. And uh I I'm not surprised at all.
Like I mean they they should be they should be very angry about this. And so uh these current invasions aren't like anything your ancestors America. Oh, I'm sure. Right. And propagandists believe authoritarian will come from Christian nationalists when in reality it's leftwing pro-Islamic socialists in a lot of cases. Yeah. And uh those abused girls in Rotherham and elsewhere just need to shut their mouths for the good adversity. I don't know if somebody said that or not. I have no idea. Can't coexist with people who think raping children is unacceptable. True. I've seen a lot of these too.
Sickening how fast the lawyers are to bury the footage to stop the riots. Honestly, like uh you know like y'all know what my opinion on on what to do about this is right that she did. Oh wow. Really? Damn. And like y'all just let that happen. That's crazy. I I guess like I mean I don't know how Britain and like the UK is so cucked. Like it's crazy how cucked they are. Like people like honestly like you should be the moment somebody says something like that like you should just deport them. Like what what is actually the reason was actually the justification to not just simply take their citizenship, seize their assets and send them to Africa, a random country in Africa.
What's actually the argument to not do It's a member of parliament. That's the that's a bigger argument to do it. That that's a big argument to do it then. Exactly. That's how big of a problem it is. Holy [ __ ] Jesus. That's scary. That stress you out. Human rights. What about the human rights of the women that were raped? Nobody ever thinks about
More from Asmongold TV
Get daily recaps from
Asmongold TV
AI-powered summaries delivered to your inbox. Save hours every week while staying fully informed.



