They can't hide this sh*t anymore..

Asmongold TV| 00:20:13|Apr 19, 2026
Chapters10
Details of a federal bust in LA overfunding and misusing funds meant to shelter and feed homeless people, including the arrest of Alexander Suker.

Asmongold dissecting a LA fraud saga: $23M siphoned from homeless services, 500 fake hospices shut down, and calls for tough justice and watchdog reforms.

Summary

Asmongold breaks down a high-profile fraud case tied to Los Angeles’ homeless services, highlighting how hundreds of millions in federal funds were routed through fake hospice facilities and extravagant personal purchases. He cites exclusive Fox footage of a morning federal bust at a LA mansion and discusses the arrest of 42-year-old Alexander Suker for allegedly defrauding LA by millions while claiming to feed the homeless. The stream blends crime reporting with sharp political commentary, connecting fraud to broader questions about oversight, governance, and the relationship between taxpayers and public programs. Throughout, Asmongold questions how oversight collapsed, noting reports that 450 hospices in California were shut down after fraudulent activity and emphasizing the societal cost when vulnerable populations lose access to care. He critiques the purported links between fraud, political incentives, and voter dynamics, arguing for accountability measures that go beyond fines. The discussion moves into policy frustrations—what should be done to recover funds, deter future fraud, and restructure programs to prevent similar abuse. The tone is combative and unapologetically pointed at systemic flaws, with comparisons to other fraud cases and a recurring theme: when oversight is weak, taxpayers end up subsidizing fraudsters and political machines. Asmongold invites listeners to consider concrete remedies, from imprisoning those involved to restructuring payments and enhancing auditing, while also voicing a controversial take on punishment and deterrence. The conversation occasionally veers into provocative hypotheticals, all aimed at provoking a much-needed public reckoning on government spending and accountability.

Key Takeaways

  • $23 million in taxpayer funds were allegedly diverted by a single individual in LA, exposing gaps in oversight for homeless services.
  • 450 hospice facilities in California were shut down in the wake of fraud allegations, illustrating the scale of systemic abuse.
  • Exclusive footage and arrest details underscore the immediacy of federal action against fraud in public programs.
  • The discussion links fraud to political incentives and calls for stronger accountability measures, including asset seizures and harsher penalties.
  • Asmongold contrasts rapid enforcement against fraud with perceived slow responses to reforming welfare programs and auditing practices.

Who Is This For?

Essential viewing for viewers interested in the intersection of government funding, fraud, and accountability, especially those who follow Asmongold’s take on policy and current events. It’s a signal that big-budget fraud stories aren’t just crime reels—they implicate governance, incentives, and taxpayer money.

Notable Quotes

""
Opening remarks about a federal bust and a high-profile case in LA.
""A million-dollar fraud, $23 million... living the high life while the people suffering on the streets""
Asmongold highlighting the personal cost to the homeless community.
""The oversight not existing is a feature, not a bug""
Critique of systemic laxity in oversight.
""I'm totally fine with that. But either way, let's keep checking this out""
Call for ongoing investigation into related facilities.
""We should get our money back because we got scammed, right? It's our money""
Stresses the taxpayer standpoint on restitution.

Questions This Video Answers

  • How did a single LA resident allegedly misuse $23 million intended for homeless services?
  • What went wrong with California hospice funding and oversight?
  • Which agencies shut down 450 hospices in California and why?
  • What reforms are proposed to prevent healthcare fraud in public funding programs?
  • How does federal enforcement address fraud in Medicare and related services?
Los Angeles fraudMedicare and hospice fraudPublic program oversightHomeless services fundingFederal bustsCalifornia fraud enforcementPolitical accountability
Full Transcript
Federal officials cut Medicare to 500 LA hospices with zero complaints. What say this man was contracted with the city and county of Los Angeles to house and feed up to 600 homeless people, but instead he was misusing tens of millions of dollars to live a luxurious life. Exclusive Fox Fox video shows the Fed's early morning bust here at the LA mansion. 42-year-old Alexander Suker was arrested. Suker's $125,000 Land Rover was seized by law enforcement. The feds say defrauded the city and county of LA out of 23. No, I I think this is Wait, this might be another guy. Million in taxpayer dollars for not only his mansion and car, but a second home in Greece, luxury vacation, a second home in designer clothes and private schools. Wow. He was living the high life while the people suffering uh homeless on the streets with no shelter, no food. They're living out in the streets. People are literally dying. And this guy is out vacationing, buying homes, buying Range Rovers, and going shopping. It's a disgrace. Prosecutors say Suker was supposed to provide three nutritional meals a day to the homeless, but during one inspection, Suker only had canned beans and ramen noodles on hand. Oh, the feds say Lucer lied about various aspects of abundant blessings, including fake vendors, facilities, and the homeless actually getting meals. The US Attorney's Office in LA says they are actively investigating at least 12 other similar fraud cases here in California. First Assistant US Attorney Billy says there's a tremendous amount of fraud in this state and that today's bust of one man who misused $23 million alone may show how little oversight there is. Well, the oversight not existing is a feature, not a bug. Uh, the reason why they don't have oversight is it's basically an informal bribery program that LA has with all of their voters where basically they create a bribery program where they fund the lifestyles of a bunch of people that are functionally [ __ ] worthless and useless and they let these people sit around, do nothing, steal stuff, and cause problems. And all those people do is they show up every 2 or 4 years and they continue voting to keep the gravy train running. And all the other people in the companies that are actually profitable and successful in California are subsidizing this lifestyle. That's really it. I'd be curious if this guy donates to politicians. Um I wouldn't be surprised. I'll tell you that California was pushing this money out quickly. uh a lot of money went out the door um with frankly very little vetting, very little checks and balances and uh he's one of the individuals that got it. The scheduled to make his first appearance. Jesus, bro. $125,000 Land Rover. Holy [ __ ] A mansion in LA and a second home in Greece. $500 fraudulent hospice facilities closed down in California. Where are you? Think about that. That's 500 hospices. Think about how many that is. That's insane. That's crazy. So, I don't even see how something like this can happen. How do you allow to have fraud on that insane of a level? And they want to arrest people like Nick Shirley. Of course, they do because Nick Shirley is [ __ ] with the system. The system, you pay these people to sit around and do nothing and then they vote for you. So if you take away the payments, then you take away their funding and these people have to leave or they might vote for something different or they're in one way or another not beholden to you. And the goal that they have is they want to make people basically reliant on the government for everything. So they can never afford to not vote for more advantages like that. Dr. And this this is it right here. What is the response to Democrats arguing that this rooting out of fraud that it's cutting Medicaid services? Uh what is your response to that? Not at all. Well, I mean I I think that honestly they are going to cut Medicaid services and people probably will die because of this. Like this is inevitable. Like I I don't think that they should use the messaging and say that oh well we're not going to have any we're not we're never going to have any collateral damage. Like we we are going to have collateral damage. It's it's it's unavoidable, right? Whenever you're making decisions and you have hundreds and thousands of these places that you're shutting down, mistakes will be made and people will be left without care that shouldn't have had the care. And if you didn't want that to happen, you should have run your system better so we didn't have to take this dramatic extreme action to undo all the mistakes that you have made systematically. So this entire like the reframing of like not only is it okay that these mistakes happen, but the mistakes are the fault of those people. Those those mistakes are a second order effect of them not holding anybody accountable for these numbers. That's really what I think. What happens to the people that uh that donate to the politicians to keep doing what they're doing in order to keep making money? Well, I mean, I think you should just put them in I mean charge them and put them in jail, right? It's pretty simple. Oh, they know it's manufactured. That's why when they say the sort of, you know, like sheepishly mentioned the possibility that you might once in a while hurt someone that's innocent. I argue that if you take a child with autism and you give them the services they need, doing a great service, it's the right thing to do where great people will always help folks in need. But if every mother is pretending because they're getting paid that the children in the neighborhood have autism, which is bad for those kids, by the way, and you're seeing that and we're seeing that in Minnesota. It's actually a really good point he's bringing up here with this. I don't know why the framing is this [ __ ] up, but um anyway, like that. Yeah. telling kids they have autism [ __ ] with their brain. Like I I think that you shouldn't like maybe this is just my opinion, right? But I don't think you should tell kids that there's something wrong with them. Like unless it's like a really really big issue, like it's better to try to let a kid try to live a normal life than tell them that like there are all these things wrong with you and so this explains every interaction that you're ever going to have, right? I think it's very dangerous to do that unless they're unless they're fat or gay, of course. You take a budget from $3 million to $400 million. You do that by three to 400 creating programs and manufacturing services that aren't supposed to be used. But what you're doing is you're hurting the child who really has autism because they can't get access to services and you're corrupting the entire system. We're seeing the same thing in California with hospice where you have one-third of all the hospital. You think we should be reimbursed? I think that we should absolutely be reimbursed and I think that what we should do. So, this is what I would do is I would figure out all the people that were in on the fraud and I would imprison them for the amount of time that it would take for them to work off the labor debt of the amount of money that they've defrauded us. So, like let's say you've defrauded us for like, you know, somebody said like $23 million. I guess you're in jail for 23 million years, right? Like I don't know. And like that would just be that would be and I would seize all their assets, take all of their stuff and you know if they were obviously like immigrants or something like that or they're naturalized citizens from another place, I would denaturalize them, seize all their assets and then send them to like Rwanda or something, right? Like that's what I would do. And I and because I think that we should get our money back, right? I mean they they they came here, they scammed us, we should get our money back because we got scammed, right? It's our money. It's not their money. So that's what I would do. You need to build a lot of prisons. I know. And I I think we could have them doing that, right? You could have them building their own prisons. That's a good idea. Just put like shot collars on them or something like that. And that way if they try to like do something wrong, you just zap them, right? It's pretty [ __ ] easy. And tree are in Los Angeles. And like by the way, like I'm being completely serious about this. Like this is actually what I think we should do. Like actually this is what I think we should do. Yeah. 100%. Not California, just LA. I mean how many people are dying there, right? told you obviously have allowed we and I'll make this announcement show where you get the idea from payments to 450 hospices in California. 450. Guess what? Not one has called us asking to reinstitute them. Wow. So 450 out of 450 were frauds and nobody's calling to be reinstituted because they know what they were doing was fraud and they were just trying to ride the gravy train all the way down to the station as far as they can possibly go. Of course you like Dr. Oz. I love him. I think he's great. I I didn't I didn't like him whenever he was running against John Federman. I didn't like Dr. But, uh, you know, he's in a role that he really understands. I think he's incredibly competent in that role and I think that what he's doing is something that's invaluable and it's something that's necessary. I'm very, very favorable towards him. They may change their minds over time, but in 10 weeks, we've shut down 450 payment systems to these guys. That's representing at least 600 700 million just this year, and no one's complaining. That's right. And like, yeah, it's the same thing with the Minnesota daycarees. How is it that we could shut down all those daycarees and bring all of that up and all the daycarees stop working then nobody's complaining about their kids not having somewhere to go? Like wouldn't you expect that if you have hundreds of these kids on the on the the the rolls the attendance ro and you have you know hundreds of these places that you would have like a massive outcry of these people that were furious that their benefits are being taken away. Why aren't leftist streamers talking about this fraud? The reason why is because the fraud subsidizes the demographics that they want to bring into the country. That's the reason why. So the reason why leftists like the fraud is because the fraud is necessary as a form of welfare in order to allow the demographics that they want to ethnically replace people in America. They want those demographics to come in, but those people can't make a living here unless it's fraud. Unless it's some form of manipulation like illegal under the table later. So that's the reason why Yeah. fraud freed the illegals. Exactly. It's scheme. Dude, you're so weird now. Well, let me get this straight. So you you say this is weird. What about what I'm saying isn't true. I'm going to pull you up. We haven't pulled. You're so weird now. What about what I said is not true? Go ahead. What is it? I want to I want to understand this. I want to get to the bottom of it. What about this? What about what I'm saying is weird. Another my feelings. Andy. Yeah. And And if you vague post, you're perma banned. Any vague post is a perma ban. Be specific or you're bad. We got to wait for it. Surely surely there's going to be something that he's saying Democrats want this. You know that isn't true. Why do you think that isn't true? Like I I think that I think they do. I think their entire voting structure is built around creating people that are basically surfs to this to the government and then keeping those people on the government payroll and those people afraid to vote against them because they might get taken off the payroll. I think that's exactly what's happening. How is it not obvious that they're the ones that want this? I'm confused. They're buying votes. Yeah, they're obviously buying votes. Every time I do this, you call out it's a minority group. Democrats scream racism. What does he mean? They don't want this. Yeah, of course. Well, they use racism as a way to suppress criticism. They say, "Well, you can't say this because it's a minority group doing this." And so, if you criticize it, it's, you know, by extra by, you know, abstraction. It's a it's racism. Too bad. Call it whatever you want. It's still true. That's just the way it is. There's no there's no there's no no example at all. It's very obvious that they're doing this, right? I mean, like, why do you think this is happening in all these uh these these leftist groups? It looks like there's no response at all. This person's taking too long to respond. Like I if if you were if you were faster, I would have I would have let this go. But I don't want to spend like how long is it going to take to just type out like what you think. And so yeah, it's just crazy. Oh my god, it's a waste of time. Whoever still supports the government, stupid. Yeah, sure. Same thing as no kings protest. Someone planted the seed to control the masses, to control votes. Yeah, I think so. The Democrat party has been co-opted by communism. Well, the reality is that all of these all these people can't live in the US and they can't sustain themselves unless it's fraud. They have to basically be babysat by America in order for them to live here, right? Because they're not producing anything of value. And so because of that, well, that's why you have all this fraud. That's why you have all the scams. It's because the scams and the fraud are necessary. And uh you're kind of wrong about scammers. They're just peeons here. Um I I I don't think that's really true. You should jail the politicians and the magistrates that allowed this to happen, not only the scammers. Oh, I agree with you. I I I would pull you up and argue with you, but I think that we basically agree. I mean, you're saying that the politicians are the ones that are allowing it to happen. I think you're right. You are, and I'm totally fine with that. But either way, um, uh, let's see here. One more. They've already shut down 500 hospices. We've already shut down 500 in Los Angeles. Um and uh and incidentally we haven't had one call from Congress or anybody else about complaining because clearly these were fraudulent. A lot of these places you'd say we they'd have um they were just invented addresses. They would obtain patient identification. [ __ ] addresses or they would pay people. They were going and giving people in poor neighborhoods flat screen televisions. See, what you need to do is you need to get every single one of those poor people in the neighborhood. You need to put every single one of them in jail. Every single one. And then put them on mandatory work programs. Figure out how much they defrauded. And then after that, they have to work all of that off. 600. I can guarantee you that society will be a better place without those people in it. Guaranteed. like anybody who's scamming the government like that, we don't need them. And then they would enlist them in the enroll them in the hospice and we were paying them $6,000. We've already shut down 500 hospice. 12 cents an hour. Yeah, I like that. Los Angeles. Um, yeah, I like that. 12 cents an hour. That seems pretty reasonable. You see the exac account of the dude that was mad that you can't see up Diana's dress and Pragmata got suspended. Sick [ __ ] No, I didn't see that. just seems like a weirdo. I mean, again, it's not really that complicated, but uh but their phone goes to voice rail. Location is entry. Okay. All right. One more. One more. One more. What's up, you guys? I'm here in Signal Hill at 2930 Gardina Avenue, where Angelus Hospice Incorporated, actually titled under Panacea Hospice, doing business as Angelus Hospice, doesn't have its door open, has a business card. Guy next door says they've changed. I mean, it looks like an empty building. I mean, I'm sorry. There's no sign anywhere. There's no label on the door. There's no uh documentation on the sides here except for probably like a building code inspection. Uh like this is I mean this looks like an empty [ __ ] building, guys. Locations. And in 2025, they filed for bankruptcy and 2 months later it was settled and they're back in operation doing what they do best. So, let's give them a call. 6298046. They had one review 9 months ago where someone said that they were always in a rush, left before the hour was up and when their family member was dying. Oh man, they're so busy that they don't have time to answer the phone. So they're that's not not being able to answer the phone. That is your that is you are you called a fake number. Like that's like you called a number that doesn't exist. That's a different thing than a voicemail. One review said that when their family member was dying, they called for an immediate nurse for assistance. They were super confused and frightened as to the process of their loved one dying. The hospice care um nurse didn't show up until several hours later after the patient had died and they gave a one-star review saying mediocre at best, always left. This is like a movie. It It's like a c Oh my god. Early didn't really care about the client and the review even went on and they cut it off and when I tried to find the review, it was removed off of Yelp and only two reviews from a year ago that have five stars are on there now. So, they've been open for almost 9 years. Okay. In 2023, they build Medicare $1.2 $2 million and they had uh $4,334 days of hospice care within the year. Meaning, yeah, I think that we need to put these people, we need to put them on hard labor and make them work off every cent of this and they need to be working for like 12 cents an hour. Like basically, you're going to jail for the rest of your life with mandatory labor and that's it. You shouldn't have scammed. Shouldn't have done it. Shouldn't it? It's too much, too long, and that's it. We're all paying for this. Yeah, I know. It's crazy, isn't it? Oh my god. They had uh I believe 78 enrolles. We're going to check back more. In 2022, they only had 20 Medicare beneficiaries and only pulled in about 210,000. But then it bumped up in 2023 to 1.2 million. So, we're going to keep checking this out, but no one's at this address. The guy said they moved. It's all over the place. And the owners have several more healthare and hospice agencies in this area. So, let's keep on moving. I guarantee you some of the people that are on their pay on their their um uh their attendance role. I guarantee you some of those people are on the payroll, too. Like, they're the ones that are getting paid off under the table for this. This is super common. And a lot of people don't know about this because it's like a like a [ __ ] it's like a ghetto scam, right? But like yeah, this is super super super common. How about we do travel restrictions and ankle bracelets, but we let them work in public for three-fifths the wages. Uh three-fifths seems like too easy of a compromise. I think it's more like 1/5if. Okay. Like may and even 1/5 is like ah you know you might be able to finish this in 10 years and like it's got to be more than that. Yeah. like one/10enth something like that. I mean, come on. And yeah, it's just nuts, man. And uh 5x of financial auditors to govern employees uh and you cut the cost of the taxpayer in half. I know. Yeah. All you have to do is find out where these scammers are going and what they're doing. And uh things will change very very quickly. I think so. My waist.

Get daily recaps from
Asmongold TV

AI-powered summaries delivered to your inbox. Save hours every week while staying fully informed.