WTF IS HAPPENING..

Asmongold TV| 00:24:21|May 5, 2026
Chapters7
Sets up a discussion about prom trend memes and the audio of Charlie Kirk being killed used in videos, framing the topic as a larger problem of online mockery and political messaging.

Asmongold critiques hardcore online violence and double standards around political empathy, urging viewers to see the real harm in mockery of political figures like Charlie Kirk.

Summary

Asmongold on Asmongold TV breaks down a disturbing trend: teens using audio clips of political figures’ violence in memes, and how this behavior exposes a broader hypocrisy in online culture. He calls out the normalization of killing rhetoric and questions the moral standards of those who demand empathy while cheerfully engaging in dehumanizing memes. Throughout the clip, he cites specific examples from TikTok where young creators used Charlie Kirk’s death as audio for prom transitions, noting responses like laughing emojis and dismissive replies. He argues that the motive is to delegitimize opponents and desensitize viewers to political violence, linking it to broader conspiracy talk about false flags and assassinations. Asmongold also discusses the gap between rhetoric and real-world consequences, referencing White House lockdowns and Secret Service briefings to illustrate how dangerous this culture can become when left unchecked. He urges proactive enforcement against violent actors and suggests that, when empathy is weaponized, the sane response is to resist it and mirror back the cruelty. The segment closes with a stark warning: the next generation of voters and policymakers is being shaped by this toxic environment, unless it’s confronted now. His stance is unapologetically hard: call out the bad actors, arrest obvious threats, and resist the corrosive narrative that normalizes violence in political discourse.

Key Takeaways

  • TikTok videos used the audio of Charlie Kirk being killed for prom transitions, illustrating how online memes can normalize violence.
  • Asmongold argues there is no moral premise or standard behind these memes, only a drive to glorify killing for political ends.
  • Teen creators as young as 15–17 are depicted as the source of this trend, highlighting a dangerous generational shift in political discourse.
  • He contrasts empathy requests from the left with the willingness of meme culture to celebrate violence, calling it a dangerous double standard.
  • Enforcement and accountability are needed: he cites Secret Service actions and ongoing investigations as examples of real-world consequences.
  • His proposed remedy is to counter increasingly violent rhetoric with decisive action against offenders, not concessions or censorship alone.
  • The discussion ties online extremism to potential real-world unrest, warning of a surveillance-heavy future if unchecked.

Who Is This For?

Essential viewing for normie and power-user audiences who want to understand how online culture can fuel real-world political violence, especially those following political commentary on platforms like TikTok and YouTube. Great for viewers concerned about online extremism and its impact on future policy makers.

Notable Quotes

""This is sick, man.""
Immediate visceral reaction to the trend of using violence audio in memes.
""They want to memeify and delegitimize and downplay Charlie Kirk getting killed.""
Core claim about the motive behind the meme trend.
""There is no moral premise to this. There is no standard to it.""
Statement on the lack of ethical grounding for the behavior.
""Just simply do the opposite.""
Call to resist weaponized empathy and mirror behavior back to detractors.
""These are 15, 16 and 17 year olds. They think that political assassination is funny.""
Identification of the age group and the disturbing belief described.

Questions This Video Answers

  • How does online violence around political figures affect real-world policy conversations?
  • Why do creators use violent moments in memes, and what are the consequences?
  • What steps can platforms take to curb violent political content without stifling free expression?
  • What evidence connects online rhetoric to real-world political unrest?
  • How should authorities respond to organized online harassment that glorifies violence?
Asmongold TVCharlie KirkTikTok censorshiponline violencepolitical rhetoricfalse flag conspiracyWhite House lockdownSecret Servicedigital empathyextremism enforcement
Full Transcript
Charlie Kirk prom trend. Here we go. Counting or not counting gang violence. Great. This is sick, man. Young teenage girls and boys doing their prom outfit transitions to the audio of Charlie Kirk being killed. Uh-huh. These are the people that are complaining about you using slurs. These are the people that are getting mad at you for saying [ __ ] That's right. And the comments are worse. This young woman posted the video and somebody responded by saying, "I'm dying like Charlie Kirk." And she liked the comment and replied by saying, "Haha, she thinks it's funny." Someone responded to another video saying, "This is so funny." OMFG. To which the girl replied, "Best transition I could find." Yeah. Not a song, not anything else. The audio of somebody being wrong with people. Well, it it's the reason why they're doing it. So, you have to understand why people like this do it. They do it because they want to memeify and delegitimize and downplay Charlie Kirk getting killed. They want to make a joke out of it instead of actually take it seriously as it's like a political assassination. So, it's the same reason why they tried to say that the recent Trump assassination attempt was a uh a false flag. It's so they can delegitimize it. That's the reason why that's the best thing she could find. And she thinks, and I want you guys to keep this in mind, like I don't this might sound like crazy, like I don't have a problem with them doing this. I I I don't care. Like, they do whatever they want. But I also think that you should keep you should take this into account and keep it in mind whenever these are the people that are telling you to have empathy and to listen to other people's feelings. This is it. Trump disrespects his dad all the time. Oh, I have no problem with that. Do whatever you want to do. But what I'm saying is that like whenever people reveal themselves to you, this is I think it just shows that you should not treat these people with any type of empathy or understanding. It's funny. She has a crying/ laughing emoji there as well. Now, to note, Tik Tok was actually removing some of these videos or actually muting the sound, but a lot of people actually went back and deleted their videos after people online started finding them and calling them out, posting their usernames. This girl had a comment left saying, "Haha, I made this one and Tik Tok took it down. Lmo." And she responded by saying, "Hoping this blank stays up." She hopes it stays up because again, she thinks it's funny. Here's another one where somebody commented, "They took off the sound with a It's crazy that it's all women, too." Sad frowning emoji. To which the girl responded by saying, "No, with the f-word at the end. She's so upset." I think it's just young teen edgginess. They're high school aged. I don't think so. I think that they um I think that people are doing it because Charlie like these I mean if you think it's young teen edgginess do you think that they would think it's funny if you did like an AI picture of like uh Donald Trump kneeling on the neck of Camala Harris or something like that and it's like the George Floyd picture. Do you think they'd think that was funny? Because if they don't think that's funny then I don't want to hear about how uh you know this is funny. Either they're both funny or neither are funny. That's my outlook on it. That they took her audio down. These people are sick, man. Now, I thought a lot about what I would want to say here. They don't have It's not a double standard that and and so that's the issue that people don't understand is you're stuck inside of the idea and it's the false premise that these people are operating inside of a logical premise. They're they're not they're simply trying to like basically normalize killing people that they don't like. So it doesn't have anything to do with like what makes sense or what's fair. It has to do with them trying to justify doing something bad to somebody. There is no moral premise to this. There is no standard to it. It's just simply we want to create an ecosystem where we can glorify killing people that we disagree with. That's it. There's nothing. So it's like but that's count there's but there's a a double standard. Well yeah there's a double standard because there is no standard to begin with the right words to be honest. I just like to point out these are 15 16 and 17 year olds. They think that political assassination is funny. They think it's a trend. And make no mistake, these are these same young teenage boys and girls who probably date their, you know, boyfriend or girlfriend for 2 weeks and then get broken up with and go home and cry for 6 months or they cry when there's gossip happening around them at the lunch table or, I don't know, their cat gets run over by the mailman and they they cry for a year straight. But when a 31-year-old who is the leader of a huge political movement, who literally hands a microphone to people who are literally older than them, just a few years where they will be in a couple of years later in life, assuming that they go to college, when he hands a microphone to them, invites them to come talk, even travels to prestigious campuses to debate. Uh, and he gets killed because they disagree with him. I don't even think these people are wellversed in politics. They're 15, 16, and 17 years old. They've just been taught to hate anybody who's on the right. They are brainwashed. They are morally rotten. These people are pathetic. We shouldn't brush this crap off. These are the next generation of people in our country. These people are going to have children. They're going to raise their children to think just like them. These people are going to vote in two and three years. These people are going to be the next generation of policy makers, politicians, and of voters. And this is a sick, cancerous mind virus. It's vile. It's vicious. It's sick. It's demented. I don't have a single problem with them doing this. But I do have a problem with them doing this. and then begging for empathy whenever an ICE agent's dragging some illegal alien pedophile out of their out of their house. I do have an issue with them asking for, you know, a degree of understanding whenever they want to tell you what words you can and can't use on the internet. Like these are and and and the point that I'm making is that these are not people that are empathetic or understanding or they have any sort of like kind of better judgment for these topics. Absolutely not. They just simply are trying to use your morals and your values against you so they can get more of what they want. That's it. And so this is the reason why like nowadays like uh anybody else that does something bad or upsetting or whatever or like these people are having a bad day or something bad happens to them, I think it's generally a good thing because they totally justified the Charlie Kirk thing. They try to invalidate every time that Donald Trump almost gets assassinated. And it's because they agree with it and they want it to happen. That's the reason why. And I think that they need to be treated that way. And also, you need to listen to the things that they say and then just do the opposite. Just simply do the opposite. Never seen this on the right, by the way. Well, I mean, like a lot of people make jokes about September 11th. And I think that's fine. And people feel ignored long enough. They don't just stay passive. They start backing more extreme candidates to force change. Yes, exactly. And uh number one best keyword warrior. I know. It's so annoying, isn't it? It's obnoxious. And uh what is this here? If I can find it. Not wishing violence on them, but not shedding its ear either. Yeah. And eventually eventually these people like I just want you to see that when bad things happen to these people not to care. That's all I want people to do. I I don't want people to have their empathy and their sympathy weaponized against them by people who will literally cheer for the ones that they agree with being shot in the neck. I don't want to I don't want to see people be taken advantage of and lied to and thinking that like, oh, I'm going to be the good person and try to help this person who's like actually celebrating people that think like you being killed. Don't do that. Don't ever make that mistake. Just drop a simple lol in their comments when they start breaking down or crying. Oh, I do more. I do worse than that. I react to it. I laugh at it and I upload it on YouTube. I do it. That's part of the fun. What do you mean? Is it possible they're just [ __ ] Yeah, I don't have a problem if people do it as a meme for an edgy meme. Who cares, right? But I don't think that's the reason why White House is on lockdown. What is this to the small business people of the You're the lifeblood of I think this was earlier, man. Like there's nothing new to this at all. I mean like there's Yeah, it's a few blocks away. I mean, yeah, somebody probably crashed out over something else. I mean, who knows why it happened. Yeah, I already saw that earlier. It was a terrorist that was injured and the suspect was taken to the hospital. Well, I mean, you know, rip bozo, right? I mean, [ __ ] him. Hopefully they put the guy in jail. So, uh, yeah. Anyway, remember, and these are the people, by the way. So, whenever you hear them talking about like, oh, well, you know, they're taking me off the air, like Steven Colbear crying about it or Jimmy Kimmel crying about it, just remember this video. This is the same thing that they always try to do is that they have no problem exercising total authoritarian control over other people and then they try to weaponize your own values against you so you won't do it to them. I think do it so bad to them so they can never do it to you again. That's what I think. Let me see this. Oh, it's it is another person. An armed man opened fire in vicinity of JD Vance's motorcade near the White House. The man opened fire on Secret Service. The USS returned fire, taking the shooter down. So, it happened again. Oh my god. This was five minutes ago. I think that Well, let me finish. Let me let me let me finish. I I'll give my opinion after this. This is nuts. This sounds kind of coordinated. I don't know. Maybe someone's going to get killed actually in office. I think that's what's going to have to happen. I feel like we're at that point where somebody in politics and in political office is going to have to get shot before they do something about this. No one else reporting on it. Yeah, this is getting close to civil unrest about this. I think Secret Service got a tip and that's why they found the first gunman. Maybe that's it, right? I don't know. Check this trending topic. Okay. Well, let me see what this is. Is this more of it? Let me let me double check. So, there's been two shootings near the White House today. Yeah. What is this? Yeah. Look at look at all these people. Oh, this is from this is from earlier today. Uh was enjoying a vacation in Washington DC. We saw presidential motorcade drive by with 20 motorcycle officers and 10 SUVs and then heard shots fired. This the first one. Yeah. People seem to have gotten radicalized. There's only one way this can end. So, this is where this is where things are going. And I talked about this in a video that I made about this is that I I wish more people would have seen that video because it this is what's going to happen. This is where things are going right now. is that we are entering into a realm where this type of like cuz you can't have a society where people are this restless. You can't have a society where people are going around trying to shoot the president on a regular basis. You can't have that happen. So what do you do to stop that from happening? You impose strict massive crazy authoritarian rules. Minority report era. That is the direction that we are going in. And if they don't stop this and shut this down, we are going to enter into a minority report 1984 like surveillance state level that has never even been seen before. I think that's where things are going. It's going to be more dystopia, more cars recording you, more phones listening to your conversations. And the reason why is because overall this is a societal decay. And this cannot be allowed to continue. You can't let this keep going. You can't let people continue to do this. Eventually, something will have to give. And what I think is going to happen is that eventually you're going to have White House was briefly locked down on Monday. And this is the other person too. Sad that both sides want this for different reasons. Yeah. Well, the re like this is my outlook on it, right? is that I think this is a this is a natural consequence for this behavior because the Republicans have controlled the government now for almost 2 years. Well, I guess 2 and 1/2 years or one and a half years, excuse me. And there hasn't been a single serious effort made to curb online extremism and this organized violence that we've been seeing now for a year and a half. We haven't seen any amount of military deployed. We haven't seen police officers using rubber bullets. We haven't seen any form of National Guard deployment. We haven't seen any level of mass FBI arrests. We haven't seen anything. So, the big problem that I have with this is the fact that at this point I feel like they want it to happen. Well, I think it's going to have to happen. I think somebody in a high position is going to have to get killed. maybe more than one person. And I'm not talking about like a podcaster or like a political activist. They don't care about that. I think that that's what happened with Charlie Kirk is that when the Charlie Kirk thing happened, I don't think guys like I mean I'm not, you know, saying anything negative about them, but like I don't think guys like J. D. Vance or, you know, like Trump see Charlie Kirk as like one of them. like he's inside of a different realm and what happened to him is unique to like his experience and I'm talking about an actual politician because it's very obvious that we have these problems. There's a very it's the responsibility of politicians on both sides to tone down the rhetoric. I don't care about toning down the rhetoric. The problem is people that are openly committing crimes, being violent, and then saying that they're going to kill different elected representatives and advocating for violence on the internet. It has nothing to do with the politicians. It has everything to do with the enforcement. So, I don't care who's doing it. You need to go after the people that do this. You do. What about the Minnesota killings? Which ones? Which ones are you talking about? the lawmakers or or what are you talking about? I'm I'm just confused. Like are you talking about like the the ICE stuff or the lawmakers? They want to be able they want there to be violence so they can shut downs free speech and second amendment. The answer is not censoring. The answer is open carry. I think the answer is that you go after the obvious bad actors that are committing crimes and you arrest them proactively before they commit crimes whenever they're advocating for it. I think that's really it. The only way to stop violence is to react with more extreme violence. Yeah, I think so. Representatives gather invaded. Well, I mean, yeah, but I I think that the the reason why that didn't go anywhere is because the person that did that was a nutball. Like they were a total nutball. Like it it wasn't like as far as I know, there was no like elaborate manifesto. There was no crazy uh reasoning for it or anything else. It's just, you know, [ __ ] I I'll look at the So, Secret Service made a comment about this. Secret Service, please. Okay, give me one second. I I am going to watch this, but I want to use the bathroom real quick. And uh it was also condemned hard on both sides. Yeah. Well, the problem is that again, you it's impossible to stop every crazy person, but it is possible to stop the obvious ones. I'll be right back. All right. All right. I'm back. Give me a minute. Calm down. Okay, let's take a look at it. United States Secret Service Police approximately 3:30 this afternoon are uh plain close officers and agents that consistently patrol the outer perimeter of the White House complex identified a suspicious individual that appeared to have a firearm. They called in support from our Marfor Secret Service police to make contact with individual. Upon making contact, that individual fled briefly on foot. Uhoh. Withdrew a firearm and fired in the direction of our agents and officers. Return fire and engaged. That individual was hit. He's since been transported to the hospital. I have no no comments on his condition. And I can tell you that at least one believe only one bystander was hit by the suspect. That individual, it's a juvenile, uh, did not sustain any life-threatening injuries, but he's also receiving treatment at the hospital. Um, I'll point out that not long before this shooting occurred, Vice President's motorcade did transit through this area. Wow. Um, the investigation itself in terms of the use of force in the shooting will be conducted by Reut Police Department. I'll pause there. Matthew, do we know how your guys identified this person as being suspicious? Was he on a radar or just how he appeared? No. My understanding is they they observed a print. We would call it visual print of a Just look at him. Look at how you look at Oh, that there. Yeah. See, he's going to you're trying to shoot somebody. firearm. These are trained surveillance detection personnel out there looking every day. Just look at it. Look for just that. Not far from the White House complex and they observed a visual print of a firearm. Did he attack the motorcade in any way? Did he approach it with any menace? No, not to my knowledge. Was there any other reason? Mhm. That's enough for me. And then do we know if if the child who was struck was definitely struck by the shooter by accident, perhaps by the officer? I can't say and we'll let the doctors figure that out, but everything I've seen makes leads me to believe and the investigators believe he was struck by the suspect. So Mr. Quinn, this man was spotted near the house and not on the property. Correct. Not on the property. We're not far. We are just real quick. We're not far at all. You have been here from where this is close to the White House. Can you tell us exactly where he was spotted? not here for this I can't say exactly but he they had been following him for a brief period of time before uniform police engaged first approach the motorcade was there any indication that that was his intent no but we will get to the bottom of that did he say anything to the officers I'm not at liberty right now until we we get but was there any sort of communication again I can't say right now the vice president in the motorcade passed the full discipline Yes. And Matthew, we see a backpack and sneakers there. Are those the suspects or are those the kids? Uh, I'm not sure. The backpack you probably see is our first aid trauma kit. That is that our officer is providing life care after shooting the suspect. Do you have an age on the uh the uh the child that was disrupted, the male female? There's a kid that got just tell you right now that it's a juvenile. Two more questions on President Trump's life. I'm sorry. Say again. Do you believe this is related potentially to the other recent attempts on front site? Maybe. I can't say. I'm not going to to guess on that. I can tell you that every time one we're patrolling this area and every site we do 247 hardcore. Whether or not it was directed to the president or not, I don't know, but we will find out. Weapon recovered. One last question, guys. I'm gonna hold on that. I'm sorry. real quick. Just like the man who was shot by uh I I don't know specifically, so I'm going to not tell an adult man. And Matthew, can you just confirm it was not a uniform Secret Service officer, but a plain clothes and was it a male The agent male agent that first fired that fired the shot? No, I can confirm with you it was uniformed Secret Service police officers that that engaged the suspect, but it was a plane close who made the first visual. Yes, sir. Deputy, thank you. Ma'am, how about that? I wonder what's going on. Journalists always sound disappointed when these psychos fall, fail, and hope the secret service are guilty of something. Yeah, I don't think the questions were really that bad, but yeah, they do usually seem weird. Why are they so violent? Well, people are violent because there's a lot of violent rhetoric. I think that's the reason why there's a tremendous amount of violent rhetoric and crazy behavior that I think people do and it just becomes accepted. Like I mean I I I saw like here's here's one of these. I'll I'll pull one one person up. So let me go back. I I'll see what this guy's saying. So any any comments on Caroline Levit's comment before the dinner. It will be funny. It will be entertaining. There will be shots fired tonight in the room. Do you think that her saying that is an indicator of anything? I knew he'd get pulled up. Yeah. Yeah, you're getting pulled up for sure. What What do you What do you think that means? Yeah. I'm just confused by this. Is there there any sort of like an explanation for it at all or a justification? like what what do you think what do you think that she meant whenever she said that? And also the guy the thing is the guy that was a Republican like I don't know if you could really say he's a Republican or a Democrat at all. I mean like he had a bunch of like didn't he have like flyers or something like that for like an anti-Trump protest and he also worked for Tim Walls. I mean, the guy seemed like a skitso to me. Like, and it it the problem is that whenever you're dealing with like these skitso people, you're not going to be able to easily assign a one-dimensional worldview to them. Like, you're not going to say like, "Oh, this person was a Republican or a Democrat." Many of the people transcend that and they are just crazy. So, keep that in mind. He was a leftist 100%. I mean, I I would definitely assume like I mean, this is just logic, right? I mean, you would assume that a person who's carrying out a political assassination would probably be on the opposite party. Like, I mean, you would just assume that or there would be something that this person, you know, the per the politician did that made this person angry. So, I don't know. Move on. He's just a [ __ ] Yeah, I think this is really it. Let me see if I can find any more of this Republican guy. It's mad as [ __ ] And yeah, this is more of the I think this is one of these people that try to reframe every one of these assassination attempts as it being a Republican so they can delegitimize it and continue enabling more uh assassination rhetoric. Uh, that's it.

Get daily recaps from
Asmongold TV

AI-powered summaries delivered to your inbox. Save hours every week while staying fully informed.