I’ve NEVER seen anything like this..
Chapters8
The creator outlines the video's purpose, clarifies monetization stance, and explains the timing and background of discussing Saikuna and related rumors.
Asmongold reacts to Saikuna/Siuno controversy, critiques the apology, and argues for clear accountability and avoiding sensational framing.
Summary
Asmongold on Asmongold TV breaks down the Saikuna drama and the accompanying apology video. He questions the framing and ethics of the original expose, especially the use of charged terms like predator and the rush to publish. The discussion dives into why content creators sometimes fear taking a firm stance, and how public sentiment can shape covering controversial topics. He scrutinizes the apology, noting missteps like the framing, the treatment of the girlfriend, and the handling of sensitive information. Throughout, he emphasizes the value of presenting diverse viewpoints, staying transparent with the audience, and owning mistakes rather than shielding them behind carefully worded defenses. The video touches on defamation concepts, the responsibility of creators, and the pressure to balance objectivity with timely reporting. Asmongold also reflects on how the audience perceives accountability, and he closes by weighing whether the creator should have simply issued a straightforward apology and paused for reflection. The overall takeaway is a call for more responsible storytelling and explicit accountability in the face of complex, ongoing online narratives.
Key Takeaways
- Using a loaded term like predator strains the nuance of the situation and can mislead viewers about consent and legality.
- The apology video is criticized for framing, pace, and not clearly owning all framing mistakes, especially around the intro and the implied accusations.
- There is a tension between reporting quickly on a hot topic and ensuring accuracy, balance, and privacy for those involved.
- Misinfo in this case included claims about the creator’s intentions and about private details; the response should focus on verifiable facts and clear accountability.
- The creator acknowledges missteps, commits to avoiding exclusive scoops in the future, and emphasizes transparency and audience honesty as core values.
Who Is This For?
Essential viewing for YouTube creators covering sensitive fandom drama or expositions of public figures, and for viewers who want a window into how to critique apology content and handle missteps with accountability.
Notable Quotes
""This video was not monetized. I'm not immediately trying to dude immediately instantaneously trying to set the stage that he's doing this for like legit.""
—Opening stance on intent and monetization to frame credibility.
""I figured that was enough. At the same time, I thought that since my channel had grown exponentially... I could maybe use my platform for a good cause.""
—Explanation of motive and perceived platform power.
""Apologies are great, but there's no use presenting them if there's no attempt to act on them.""
—Critique of performative apologies and call for real change.
""Just tell the truth. Just [expletive] man. Like I hate to see people break frame over nothing, man.""
—Frustration with hedging and framing rather than direct accountability.
""I will never give another exception to a scoop or exclusive info. I will do what I've always done on this channel...""
—Commitment to no longer chasing exclusive scoops at the expense of accuracy.
Questions This Video Answers
- How should creators handle sensitive exposés about public figures without crossing lines about consent or privacy?
- What makes an apology video come off as genuine or performative in online controversy?
- What is defamation in the context of YouTube content, and how can creators avoid reckless statements?
- Why do some creators wait for public opinion before making a stance, and is that strategy ever justified?
- What responsibilities do VTubers and online celebrities have when personal relationships become public?
Asmongold TVSaikuna/Syiko/Saikuno controversyapology video critiquedefamation awarenessconsent and sexual conduct discussionsonline content criticismpublic accountability VTubers and online communities
Full Transcript
So, I have never seen something like this happen with an expose where this guy gets he gets exposed for talking to like 50 different girls, then everybody finds out that, you know, it's like it was mostly consensual, it seemed, right? It was consensual. It's damage control. Well, let me go back. All right, we're going to watch this. So, he's been getting a lot of hate for this. We're going to find out why. All right, so first things first. This video is not monetized. I'm not immediately trying to dude immediately instantaneously trying to set the stage that he's doing this for like legit.
Okay, here we go to pull a CC in the big 2026. I'm making this in regard to my last video about Syuno. I want to clarify how this video came to be while also taking accountability and apologizing for the mistakes that I made. At the same time, I also want to clear up some misinformation spread about me over the last few days. This video was meant to come out a bit earlier, but I was told by someone in the know that Saikuna might release a joint statement with his girlfriend. So, I chose to wait for that first just in case.
I'll also be going through that later in the video. So, how did this all begin? Well, for me, it was on April 7th when I was reached out to by Mal for the first time. I was told that a Google doc was released. So, she reached out to him to complain about it soon about a big content creator. And this is when I was asked if I wanted access to it early to maybe make a video about it. the document was going to publicly release which is exactly by the way just real quick this is exactly what I predicted this is exactly what I thought it was going to be 10th anyway this means that this wasn't some grand conspiracy okay this document was going to release with or without 7 days rumors of Saikuna's behavior have been floating around for a while now between certain content creator circles none of this was going to really convince me to make an early video if you've watched my channel before then you'd know that I'm someone who highly values both sides of the story it's actually something that I always implore you to do before forming your own opinions.
And while I do receive so many DMs about scoops or exclusive info about certain topics, I mostly never take them. Always choosing to wait for things to unfold in public first before making my videos. What made the situation special though was the 17-minute video recording of the voice call between Mal and Saikuno. My logic here was simple. It was me thinking that we already had the other side of the story. And it was Syikuno admitting to his wrongdoings in the most raw and unfiltered way possible. So, I figured that was enough. At the same time, I thought that since my channel had grown exponentially, don't ask me how or why because I have no idea.
I could maybe use my platform for a good cause, spreading awareness about Saikuna's behavior so that no one else gets tricked into being a home wrecker against their will, while in parallel encouraging others who have been wronged by him to finally speak up. Additionally, seeing that the person speaking up was doing so from a small account, I figured I could help amplify that message to spread maximum awareness. I mean, there's nothing wrong with you making a video about it. I don't think there's anything wrong with him doing that. I think that people are always going to look at something like that as being kind of like a uh um it's going to be kind of like I'm trying to think of the best way to explain it.
It's like it's opportunistic. they will look at as being opportunistic. I think that the problem is that you framed it in a way that you know you call the guy a predator, right? I mean, like that's a crazy word to use for an adult male who has consensual sex with adult females. Like that's cra that's a crazy word to use for that situation. Yes, some people could definitely argue that I was desperate for a topic to bring in views, but to me, it didn't matter because I was already lucky enough to be able to cover niche topics I enjoy and still somehow reach over a million views on them.
Again, don't ask me how because I don't know, but that was just the reality. Here's the thing, though. Releasing the video around the same time as the document meant that I was taking a substantial risk by putting my channel's reputation on the line. I knew this even at the time. I don't like this framing because it seems to me like what you're saying is that you like you take a risk. Well, why is it a risk? Because the public sentiment could be different. Well, why would the public sentiment matter? If you think that what you're saying is accurate, then it shouldn't matter what the people think.
Like, oh, oh, I make videos after people after it becomes public and people know. Like I think that there's a lot of people that this is the people are so many there are so many slaves to consensus that we have where like you come out and you take a firm stance on something that you think was wrong and then the public sentiment is slightly different and now there's a problem. Like you should you should stand by it. If that's what you if you think that's what it is then that's what it is. Like you shouldn't go and act like well I didn't really think that or whatever.
I mean, I I think that there's a lot of these commentary creators, this is like really common, and I I'm not going to call out anybody by name, right? I don't think it's like any one person. I think it's just like a general sentiment where a lot of times when like a complex issue comes out, a lot of people are afraid to touch it. And they're not afraid to touch it because they don't think something about it. They're afraid to touch it because they don't know what other people think about it. And so so much of commentary YouTube I think is built around reinforcing existing biases and basically telling people what they want to hear.
And I understand I mean it's entertainment and it's media etc. But you know whenever you're giving your opinions on things saying whether something's good or bad I think that the value of that gets tremendously diminished when it seems like what you're really waiting for when you make videos is for people to make that decision for you and then for you to tell them what they've already said. And I think there's a lot of examples of that. It's a big problem and there are very few people that are willing to come out right in front of something and then uh have an opinion on it unless it's something that's like super obvious, right?
Like I don't know like the doc thing or something else, right? So yeah, it's just corny. It was just horny and desperate. Well, I'm just saying like that's what it was time. But it was a risk. This is like this is like a creator criticism, right? Like this isn't a criticism about like you know like what the video was. I think this is like a meta level problem where commentary accounts are a lot of times afraid to express themselves because they're worried they can put themselves at odd with what the public consensus is if it meant that I was doing the right thing.
Unfortunately though it didn't really work out as I had hoped and I ended up making mistakes that I need to take accountability for which is why we're here today. The first mistake can be found in the intro of the video and it's me using the word predator. Yes, it was my idea and the logic behind it was me trying to encompass everything like the serial cheating, lying, and deliberate targeting of smaller content creators into one word before you I mean using it. I even made sure to double check its definition in multiple dictionaries which said things like a person or an organization that uses weaker people for their own advantage or one who injures or exploits others for personal gain or profit.
Due to this, I had to come to the conclusion that yeah, this word fits. I'd find out this is an intentional oversimplification, I think. And I think it's a dishonest intentional oversimplification. We all know that words carry different context and pretextes inside of a conversation. And I think that when you use that, it's confirmed the girl opened a Patreon 10 days before the expose was dropped. This is starting post. The rest is kind of NSFW. Well, oh my god. So this was 10 days before she put out the twit longer about Syuno. She thank you for being my little organ donor.
It makes me so happy to see you here. I hope we can have many fun moments and I can comfort you when you feel down. I've been shy to finally make a Patreon, but I finally did. It's something I'll have to get used to. So please understand and bear with me as I learn how to make you guys the happiest I can. I'll be posting a lot of pictures of cosplays that I don't post on Twitter. And I'll be making ASMR for the first time as well. Oh my god. I mean, this is a little bit it's contextual, not definitional.
Yeah. Because like the thing is that I mean, for example, like I I don't know. I think that like for example, the way that people use the word pedophile. I think that they overuse that term in a lot of cases in order to establish a moral high ground that can't be questioned. And I think that predator to a greater extent is misappropriated on a regular basis. In my opinion, a person is not a predator when they respect like consent has to be violated for somebody to be a predator. Quickly afterwards though that for many people that word is only reserved to describe pedophiles or sexual predators, which made a substantial amount of people feel misled after watching the intro of my video.
It made it seem like a hit piece exaggerating things and it also made it seem like Syuno had committed very serious crimes enough to land him in a highsecurity prison or something. But that clearly wasn't the case. That was not my intention at all and I'm sorry for that. From now on, I'll only use that word to refer to pedophiles or sexual predators. That's it. No exceptions. I'd also like to say that yes, the video was rushed. It simply didn't meet the quality standard that you'd expect of me. And that's without even mentioning that it was clearly biased and didn't attempt to see different viewpoints.
There's a reason I don't typically reach out to people involved in public incidents because it's very easy to form bias after you communicate directly with them. It's just human. So yeah, what Mal said at the end of her call with Syuno was offputting and it wouldn't have hurt for me to point that out. I get that. I was instead more focused on Syuno's admittance of guilt. I'm sorry for letting you guys You mean her still wanting to be friends with him? Yeah, of course. In that regard, you trust me with a certain quality standard and I just couldn't deliver it this time and that's on me.
I also want to apologize to Saikuna's girlfriend. In the 17-minute video of the voice recording, there was one frame, which represents 160th of a second that wasn't blurt, and it leaked to the group chat she was in when she found out that Saikuna had been cheating on her with multiple people. This frame was enough for certain individuals to confirm her username, and it impeded on her privacy. I was not the one who, damn, handled blurring it, but I still included the entire thing in my own video and completely missed that detail. So, I take full responsibility for that.
I'm sorry. Now, look, with all that being said, apologies are great, but there's no use presenting them if there's no attempt to act on them. And that's exactly what I intend to do. But first, I want to go through some misin spread about me in recent days and set the record straight. Let's see it. When the video first released, XQC reacted to it almost immediately and would spend his time defending Saikuna while trying to undermine the things he's done to people. He would also comment on my video. In that comment, he'd make it seem like my problem with Syikuno's behavior had to do with the lack of clout of the women he reached out to.
In any case, what would happen? I would say that's a fair criticism. And I think that you did frame Syuno as using a perceived power imbalance inside of the industry in order to leverage that to have a relationship with these girls. I think that that was indicated in the video. I think that's accurate. Next is a narrative that would form saying that I deleted his comment because I couldn't handle his unparalleled wisdom. As you can see, that's false. It's still right here along with all the wonderful comments left by his community, too. I really don't know why he and some other content creators tried so hard to defend Saikuna's behavior as if he was their longlost brother or something.
Here's the reason why. And I can speak as somebody else who like I didn't really even entirely defend them. I I criticized a lot of things, but like I think here's the reason why people were critical of it. The reason why is because he didn't do anything that was non-consensual and the things that happened between him and these girls were private. And I don't think that a lot of people want to have their sexual history and their sexual misgivings be broadcast to the public unless they're inside of the spectrum of illegal activity. And I think that the moment that you do that with especially a famous person or somebody who's well-known, I think that it makes a lot of other people uncomfortable because they're worried that now you're creating an ecosystem and a culture around exposing people's sexuality and like their sexual history and other types of private information and private, you know, experiences to the whole world.
and you're creating a reward structure and ecosystem around doing it in a way that is not illegal and it is not even borderline on illegal. And that's another very big difference, right? It's not like any of this was like, oh, it was kind of bad, but it was gray. None of this was even gray. It was purely black and white and none of it was bad. So, in terms of like a legal perspective, right? So that's the reason why people were so defensive about it because they don't want to have videos made about themselves when some ex-girlfriend frames things in a way and then they have some YouTuber making a video that gets a million views that calls them a predator.
Like that's the reason why it it's it's purely like people and this is the thing they put themselves in that situation and they say how would I feel if this happened to me and you know I did this and that would be crazy. That's the reason why All I know is that cheating has been shunned by humanity for thousands of years regardless of gender. Maybe normalizing it now. So is I mean like again like I think this is true definitely. Well actually well let me just it's not even a relevant point. It's probably a bad idea but hey you're free to form your own opinion.
Go for it. Next. Some people tried to claim that I changed my video's title because I was scared of a defamation lawsuit from Saikuna. Sure. A random lawyer from Fiverr might claim that, but it's false. Here's a neat trick. You can go to a website like vstats.com. Go to any channel. We'll pick, I don't know, Mr. Beast. Click on a video and you'll actually be able to see any thumbnail or title changes since upload. Pretty cool, right? Now, if you were to do that with my video, you'd see that there were no thumbnail or title changes whatsoever since upload.
So, that's false. And look, defamation. Let me go back and look at this here. I mean, there's only four or five data points in each day. I mean, this doesn't actually even dis like I don't even think this matters, but like if you want to get down into the weeds about this, this actually doesn't disprove that argument. It doesn't disprove that argument because there's not enough data points that track changes at all. And so, there could have been a title change that wasn't being tracked by this by this website. I think a change forces a data point.
Oh, well, if a change forces a data point, then I would be wrong. I just don't know the answer to that. Look, defamation is about knowingly lying about someone in order to ruin their reputation. I had no intent. That's not true. Um, defamation can also be doing it with a reckless disregard for the truth. You can look that up. Uh, I'll do it myself. So here it is. I can read it right here. Reckless disregard for the truth is a key component in actual malice and liel law requiring the publisher acted with a high degree of awareness the statement was probably false or entertain serious doubts about the truth.
So actually uh at a certain point that is it's just a factually not true statement. But yeah anyway so he's intentionally lying. Well he's probably not lying. He just doesn't know that. I mean, a lot of people why why would somebody know that? A lot of people don't know that of lying in my video about Syuno. And if I did want to lie, then wouldn't I have just simply remove the last two minutes of Mal and Syuno's voice call so that she looks way better and he looks way worse? It just doesn't make sense. I never make any video with the intention of lying.
That's a that's a fair like that that that's the first good defense I think he's had so far is that he didn't reframe it. And so the not reframing it in a way that makes it more sympathetic to him implies that he wasn't trying to craft the narrative that this is the first good actual defense. Period. And finally, when it comes to misinfo, there's also something else that honestly doesn't deserve attention at all, but I'll still mention it. And it's this weird rumor or fanfiction that some people made up saying that I only made this video to try and get with the women that were affected by Saikuna's action.
Oh god. Right. Okay. Sure. Anyone who knows me or has ever spoken with me in the content creation sphere knows that I never even attempt to flirt. I keep things strictly professional. I take my platform very seriously and would never seek to use it in that way. It's simply not who I am. It's obviously also very disrespectful to anyone who was hurt by Syuno's actions, but it's not like the people pedaling these rumors cared about them to begin with. All right, so next up we have I mean, was anybody that was like a legitimate person saying that or were there just Twitter accounts saying that?
joint statement that was posted by Syuno. And who actually the first half would be written by Syuno. In it, he'd reiterate that he lied to people about being single and that he has been unfaithful to his girlfriend. He'd apologize and say that he'd be taking a break from streaming in order to better himself. He'd also call out anyone trying to frame him with false accusations. So, yeah, as you can see, not much has changed. He's already admitted to these things in the voice call with Mal. When it comes to false accusations though, yes, there are stories that I've circulated for years among some VTubers that accuse Syikuno of doing worse than cheating.
At this point, though, it is not up to me to say whether it's true or not. Just pointing out what he might be referring to. He could also be referring to the word predator, which I already apologized for. Now, the second half of this, well, also that one girl that came out and told that story that was framed in a way that I would never sleep with somebody who wasn't like I mean, she framed it in a way that would lead people to believe that something happened that was non-consensual. I think that's a fair analysis would be written by his girlfriend.
She'd express how hard this has all been on her and how hurt she felt over not having a choice on whether this went public or not, saying that she understands that many people were hurt, but that her feelings felt like they weren't really considered. This whole story is lame. One girl got cheated on and a bunch of hoes got played. That's all this is uh base at all. She'd call out people who sought to use this incident for profit and would say that even prior to this going public, she was already trying to work through things with Saikuno in order to repair their relationship together.
She'd end her statement by saying that even with everything that has come out, she doesn't consider Saikuna's actions irredeemable. She's going to stay with him and try to fix their relationship in spite of everything. Listen, I can't imagine what she's been through in just these last few weeks. Finding out that your boyfriend has been cheating on you for years, that he slept with someone. So, is this accurate that the way that people found out that Syuno's girlfriend was this girl was through this dude's video? Is that the only point on the graph that shows that she's the person?
So, he actually caused this to happen. Oops. Ah, you can't win them all, right? AH, YOU KNOW, MISTAKES HAPPEN. AH, YOU WIN SOME, you lose some. [ __ ] happens. It is what it is. Is December 2025 behind your back? And that he was still trying to arrange a meet up with someone else as you were already trying to fix your relationship after what had happened in December. I mean, seriously, it's just insane. But I do think this needs to be said. The fact that this went public is unfortunate, but people were genuinely hurt by Syuno lying to them that he was single.
Maybe it's an unpopular opinion at this point. Let me know if you think it is, but if someone lied to me about being single, and I later found out that us having sex directly hurt their partner, made them depressed, and ruined or at least endangered a 5-year long relationship, I wouldn't be able to live with myself, that's simply not what I would have signed up for. And seeing that he's a public figure who used this public standing to get with these, it didn't endanger the relationship. It seems it seems like the relationship's just fine. women after lying to them.
It felt like this going public was going to be inevitable. But that doesn't mean that her feelings are not valid because they are. When it comes to me, I did have a hand in spreading this to the public by releasing my video so quickly and I simply had no right to do so. And for that, I am sorry. Now, I disagree with that. I think you should be able to do whatever you want. You want to make a video about it, it's totally fine. Stick by it. Don't like why why are you breaking frame? Why are you allowing somebody else to create a narrative for you?
you thought this guy was a manipulative uh cheating abuser that lied to women and uh took advantage of them. Just own it. Say say what you think. Like why why are we why are we playing this double language? And the thing is that like he was like and you're right. He manipulated them. He lied to them. He did things to them under false pretenses. No gentleman would do that. And it was awful that he did that. So why are we playing games about this? Why? Why? Why is it that so many people are unable to come to any sort of a moral conclusion without waiting for everybody else to allow them to feel that way?
That's the truth. That's the way it is. Like, yeah, you can say that it was, you know, not super bad, but it wasn't super good either. Like, I mean, this is it. He's doing damage control. Yeah. I I mean, what are we doing here? Just just tell the truth. Just [ __ ] man. Like I I hate to see people break frame over nothing, man. It's crazy. Some people's reactions to this announcement. And yeah, as you might expect, it's not sunshine and roses. This whole topic has been extremely polarizing on the internet to begin with, and the girlfriend in particular is getting hate thrown her way with people calling her things like gold digger or Stockholm syndrome victim for not leaving him.
Here's the thing, though. What matters here is that Saikuno stops his serial cheating streak and that he stops lying to women about him being single while turning them into home wreckers against their will. That's it. If she wants to stay, that's her choice. She doesn't deserve to get nasty things said about her, though. I wish her the best, and I again would like to apologize if I directly contributed to any harm that she might have gone through. That was not my intention. Look, ultimately, my favorite YouTuber growing up was PewDiePie. Yeah, I enjoyed his sense of humor.
The fact that for the longest time he was the that bridge clip was funny. Same sole runner of his channel which gave him so much authenticity. But most of all, what I really liked about him was that he was not ashamed of being human. He would make mistakes, but when he would, he'd also sincerely apologize and work to learn from them. Mhm. It's no secret that today, as a content creator, if you were to make a mistake, it would be so much easier to wait for it to die down in a week and then continue business as usual, as if nothing had happened.
I was even advised by some to do exactly that and not Yeah, I think that it would have been a better idea for him to just make a statement about it and that's it. Making a video like this, I think, looks really bad. And the reason why it looks really bad is that you're you're basically you're you're now you're losing on both sides because like you've already lost the people that think that Syikuno is some manipulative abuser because now you're trying to soften your criticism for him and from their perspective you are now, you know, basically making allowances for a predator because they agree with that that terminology.
I don't agree with that but they do. And so, so you're you're losing the audience that you're trying to get by doing that. And then you're also losing the audience. Like you're not going to have the based red pill viewers watch this and think to themselves, "Oh, he understood what he did wrong." Like 99 times out of 100, addressing and apologizing for something is really just a mistake. And whenever it's not a mistake, the more words you use, the more wrong you are. If you just say, "Yeah, I was a bit too much and I'll try to tone it down." It is what it is, right?
Moving on. That would have been a thousand times better than uh explaining yourself and trying to say, "Well, it wasn't me that edited the video and it was one frame." Why would it matter if it was one frame? Like, that's like saying I shot somebody, but I only pulled the trigger for, you know, like half of a second and it was in the entire day. So, why don't we talk about the rest of the day rather than the point in time where I shot somebody? Like, if you make a mistake and the the the mistake is not measured by its frequency, it's measured by its effect.
So, it just it doesn't make any sense to me. Like, it it's it's a weird way of downplaying something. And I don't know why you would say that. Mujin attacked Powder for coming out and giving her experience with Syuno. I I I don't know what happened. I I I that's like a second [ __ ] drama thing. I I don't know. But my point is that and like I I think that I mean again like I mean she was right. I mean for saying what she wanted to say. I think she was fine. But it's like just drama and anything after is [ __ ] Just say sorry.
Yeah. Release this video. And I understand why it unfortunately works. But to me it's simply the right thing to do. Even if it leads to more scrutiny and people disliking me. I screwed up. I'm going to say sorry and I will improve. So what am I going to change exactly? Well, to start, I'll never give another exception to a scoop or exclusive info. I will do what I've always done on this channel and talk about things that have already played out in public. I don't care if a five-star general gives me info about World War II starting tomorrow.
I will make the video after the nukes drop. I also realize now just how much you guys value my objectivity. I understand that I'm not perfect at it and I probably never will be, but I'll always I think one way to really measure whether somebody is authentic or not is how often they go against their own audience. And I think that if somebody never goes against their own audience, the odds are that like I mean waiting for consing for things to be public I think is like a double-edged sword. Like this is just my perspective as another kind of creator inside of the same space is that a lot of people wait for that consensus because they don't want to be on the wrong conclusion.
You as well I mean I'm on I'm against my audience all the time on stuff. I I say that constantly. Right. You're waiting for the crowd. Yeah, definitely. Like I mean then I react to things as they happen on the first day and like you know like there have been a lot of times where like for example like the Renee good like that girl that got shot by ice I said rip bozo the the morning she was shot. Now, I think that over time, you know, it I've been proven to be right, RIP Bozo. But at the same time, you know, a lot of people were angry at me for that, but too bad.
That's the first one that can come out of my mind, right? And I'm sure there's other examples, too. Strive to present information to you in the most balanced way possible so that you can in the end form your own opinion. And finally, no matter how much this channel grows, I'll always ask you to be honest with me and I promise to take accountability when needed, just like how I'm doing right now. So, look, if the last video was a dealbreaker for you and you want to unsubscribe, then I completely understand, but I won't let you leave without thanking you first.
Take care and may our paths cross again someday. On the other hand, if you're planning to stick around for future content, then I'd like to thank you so much for allowing me to make a mistake and grow from it. I say this all the time when I stream, but not a day goes by where I take any of this for granted. and the fact that so many of you watch me. Whether you're driving home, chilling at work, doing chores, knitting, or just eating, I'm so honored to be able to make your day a bit less mundane with my videos.
It's truly a blessing. Thank you. I also would like to thank my Discord mods, my friends, and my viewers who reached out during this time. It meant a lot, and I really appreciate it. The Syuna video was live for a week, so I'll keep this video live for a week as well. However, I do plan to private the original video as soon as this video gets uploaded. I hope to be back sooner rather than later, continuing to make videos that you enjoy at the level of quality that you expect of me. As always, thank you so much for watching until the end, and I'll be sure to see you in the next video, whenever that is.
Jesus Christ. Jesus. Jesus. Oh my god. Oh man. What are we going to do with something about that? Not now. I I think if I was going to rate this apology video, I would rate it like a I would give it like a three or a four. I I would I think it's a very very lowquality apology video. It wasn't that good. It could have been a lot better. You uh basically saying he's not a predator. like the using the dictionary definition like this video seemed like you were trying to get people to stop being mad at you.
It's not about you explaining yourself or your point of view or you know like cuz the only thing that he really did wrong in my opinion was leak the girl's name. Everything else that he did was totally fine. Like I mean if you want to call the guy a predator, I mean like technically I'm sure that you can stretch that definition and I I think culturally you shouldn't say that about somebody, but at the same time people are going to have whatever they want. But like that was the only real mistake that you made. Other than that, I mean, oh, I'm going to wait for this to go public so then I can wait to see what other people say and then say the same thing.
I I just I don't get that, man. I really don't. I think it's weird and that's really it. Another Syuno Google drop dropped. I'm sure it is passive aggressively retaliating still. Yeah. And uh we're so close to mus doc. What is your you know it's bad when the monotone voice comes out. Oh boy. Right. And uh what is this? Please maintain this video. It's important for transparency. Well I mean you know that's why we're reacting to it. Right. And so my experience with Mujin and Psych Powder made a one and a half hour. Oh my god.
Oh my god. We did it from a place of Oh man, they're farming this out for a bit, right? And so anyway, new Doc, he was talking to a minor. No, he wasn't. He He talked to a minor in a completely platonic way and then literally 5 years later, not the day she turned 18, not even the year she turned 18, she wasn't even a teenager. And then he was he was sexual with her later on after that. I'm sorry guys, but like if you're trying to make that the same as people that groom girls out of high school, this is obviously a very very different thing.
So I don't think that's it. It's all content. Yeah, exactly. Just time stamp on the comments. I don't know what it is. But anyway, would you consider the Indians who scammed the elderly as predators? I I I I would. But I would also say that those are people that are abusing consent and breaking the law. So that would actually go in line with what my uh definition of predator is, right? Is a person who willfully and deliberately uh ignores consent and takes advantage of people uh without or uh against their consent. So yeah, absolutely I would.
So uh yeah, time to take ants. I'm saying they're opportunist predators. Yeah, they are. He wasn't spawn camping, but he was but she was on his watch list. I mean five years later, I would say five years later isn't really that crazy. Like I mean don't get me wrong it's definitely kind of weird etc. And as a creator like my advice to any other like content creator it's just don't talk to anybody who's underage of the opposite gender. Just don't do it. And and if you want to expand that to saying even of the same gender that's fine too.
Like in my opinion like we've always had Pope Leo clarified there's no drama with Trump. Basically saying people need to stop clip chimping. Pope Leo said to stop clipchimping finally. And uh they're fishing now. Yeah, exactly. Never cost never uh talked to girls. Yeah, definitely. It's nothing weird. She was 19, he was 27. I mean, that's fine. Like I mean that's a pretty big age difference, but like it's still fine. So this is him talking again about about Donald Trump. Oh boy. It's weird in their late 20s to be talking to a 17-year-old. Yeah. But I mean like if somebody reaches out that's like a fan and you have like a cordial, polite, you know, 10-minute conversation with them privately and they talk to you like one other time after that.
I don't view that as like like I don't know the extent of the conversations or what they were. All I'm saying is that I don't think that people should look at interactions with minors as like just automatically sus. I don't think so because I think that that's like again that's like porn brain like [ __ ] like pedto like oh my god news media scaring me about everything. Like I I don't I don't think that's really accurate. But at the same time, like it's weird. I don't really think it's weird. Like I mean, if you talk to somebody who's like 16, like that doesn't mean that you're trying to sexually groom them, man.
Like like why why would you why would that be the first thing that you think of? Why would you think of that? Why why would that be a first thing you come to the conclusion to? Right? And so XQC said he'll never talk to or do anything with any underage person ever. I don't blame him. I mean, I really don't. I mean like to me I I don't I mean like all my audience is like way older. I don't even have it's not even a thing that would happen. Like I I don't know like if somebody told me they were 17, they asked me like I don't know what camera do you use?
I'd say this is the camera that I use, right? But like I don't know. I think it goes without saying that you shouldn't have sexual conversations with minors. Like uh what are we what are we doing? Like this is all if you need this explained to you, you need to go in a box. Okay? Like that's my opinion. It's so obvious. Everybody knows it. If you don't know it, you need to go to therapy. That's it. Anyway, let's see here. Come on. Yeah, it's so [ __ ] weird, man.
More from Asmongold TV
Get daily recaps from
Asmongold TV
AI-powered summaries delivered to your inbox. Save hours every week while staying fully informed.




