BREAKING: Big Daddy Government Protects us from Fable and Mythos
Chapters6
The host is recording late at night, excited and overwhelmed by Fable 5 and ideas he's been pursuing.
DesignCourse’s take on the Fable 5 shutdown saga: a late-night rumination on government action, AI safety, and competition in the AI space.
Summary
DesignCourse’s video pivots from a late-night gaming session to a spicy take on the US government’s directive to suspend Fable 5 and Mythos 5. The host riffs on Anthropic’s marketing, national security concerns, and the questionable timing ahead of June 22’s API pricing change. He cites a government directive that cites national security, notes the lack of detail in the letter, and questions the justification for pulling a product used by millions. He contrasts government action with a belief in the need for transparent, fair, and technically grounded regulation. Throughout, he weighs the tension between corporate control, regulatory overreach, and the impact on developers with multiple projects in flight. The video blends humor, heated opinion, and a call for more competition in AI, while acknowledging the uncertainty of what’s really happening behind the scenes. DesignCourse’s host finally invites comments and wraps with a personal note about sleep and disrupted plans. The overall tone is skeptical, opinionated, and fiercely pro-competitive in the AI landscape.
Key Takeaways
- Anthropic claims of a national security concern were used to justify an export control directive suspending access to Fable and Mythos 5 for all users and foreign nationals.
- The host highlights a lack of detailed justification in the government letter, which cited a method of bypassing or jailbreaking Fable 5 but provided few specifics.
- A 5:21 reference shows the directive’s timing and adds to questions about how such actions align with transparency and technical substantiation.
- June 22 API pricing changes are cited as a driver of competition concerns, suggesting financial incentives behind regulatory actions.
- The host argues for a transparent, fair regulatory process grounded in technical facts rather than market consolidation or marketing narratives.
- There is a belief that competition in AI should be maximized to prevent single entities from exerting undue influence over the ecosystem.
- The video frames the issue as a clash between corporate power, government policy, and consumer/developer freedom, rather than a simple tech controversy.
Who Is This For?
Essential viewing for AI developers and power-users who rely on Fable 5/Mythos 5 or follow Anthropic and regulatory news. It’s also a must-watch for anyone tracking how API pricing and government actions influence the AI tooling landscape.
Notable Quotes
"The US government citing national security authorities has issued an export control directive to suspend all access to Fable and Mythos by any foreign national whether inside or outside the United States including foreign national Anthropic employees."
—The quote captures the core assertion that triggers the shutdown and frames the regulatory move in the video’s opening argument.
"We are complying with the government's legal directive in removing access to Fable and Mythos 5 for all users. However, we disagree with the finding of a narrow potential jailbreak should be cause for recalling a commercial model deployed to hundreds of millions of people."
—This contrasts compliance with a principled objection to the breadth of the directive and the justification used for the action.
"This action does not adhere to those principles."
—The speaker emphasizes the call for a transparent, fair, and technically grounded regulatory process.
"One of these large companies, I'm not sure if it was Anthropic, but they even said they want an FDA-like panel for approving AI."
—Highlights a provocative comparison between AI governance proposals and traditional regulatory gates.
"We need max competition in the AI space."
—Summarizes the video’s central policy stance: more competition to counter consolidation and control.
Questions This Video Answers
- What happened with the government directive to suspend Fable 5 and Mythos 5, and why is it controversial?
- How does jailbreaking relate to AI safety concerns and government regulation?
- Why do some voices want an FDA-like panel for approving AI technologies, and what are the potential downsides?
- How might June 22 API pricing changes impact developers using Fable 5/Mythos 5 or Anthropic models?
- What factors drive competition in the AI space, and how can policy foster it without stifling innovation?
Full Transcript
What in the hell is going on? Oh my god. Yeah, it's late. I never make a video this late. It's 10:00 p.m. Eastern time. I'm over here vampiring out with Fable 5 like we all are. I have these crazy ideas. I've just been going like a crack addict. I seriously, like the last 72 hours I've been just hammering [ __ ] left and right because Fable 5 is like such a jump up from what we've been used to and you know, I'm you know, I'm addicted to X. I hit X. Hit that little X button and this is what I see.
The US government directive to suspend access to Fable 5 in Mythos 5. What the Now, I have some thoughts about this, but let's like read this stupid [ __ ] article real quick because I I mean, it's just it's amazing. First of all, this is like the longest run-on sentence ever. The US government citing national security authorities has issued an export control directive to suspend all access to Fable and Mythos by any foreign national whether inside or outside the United States including foreign national Anthropic employees. What in the hell? Okay. We received the directive from the government today at 5:21.
The letter did not provide specific details. Okay, let me just repeat that. It didn't provide specific details of its national security concern. So, literally they came in or they send a letter, they give them a call, they say, "Hey, shut down, you know, the biggest part of your product that's being used by millions upon millions of people. We have a national security concern. All right, go ahead and deal with it." Now, one part of me thinks, "Okay, this is this is Anthropic's model of marketing. It's doom marketing, all right? Our models are so scary. We don't know how they work.
We don't know what they'll do. Um we should be regulated by big daddy government, you know? This could very well be it, but it could also be government authoritarianism." And we also know that they'll be using these technologies to, you know, basically control the [ __ ] out of us. So, maybe both can be equal, both can be true. I don't think Anthropic would completely make that up or fabricate it, but they're going to use this to their advantage. So, our understanding is that the government believes it has become aware of a method of bypassing or jailbreaking Fable 5.
All right, we viewed a demonstration of the specific technique being used to identify a small number of previously known minor vulnerabilities, and these vulnerabilities appear relatively simple, and we have found that other publicly available models are able to discover them as well without requiring bypass. Okay, so yes, for sure, jailbreaking has been around since as long as the models have been around. Okay, so it basically it goes on with a bunch of these bullet points um to kind of support their case that they don't think this is justified. Um clearly at face value, I don't think it's justified either, 100% full stop, no [ __ ] way.
So, we are we are complying with the government's legal directive in removing access to Fable and Mythos 5 for all users. However, we disagree with the finding of a narrow potential jailbreak should be cause for recalling a commercial model deployed to hundreds of millions of people. As we have stated publicly, we believe the government should be able to have the ability to block unsafe deployments as part of the statutory process that is transparent, fair, clear, and grounded in technical facts. This action does not adhere to those principles. So, what is it? What do you guys think the actual situation is?
It's very hard to know one way or the other. I On one hand, we have Anthropic who does Anthropic things, and then we have the government, which we know is basically the most evil corrupt entity ever devised by man. So, could it be both? I mean, perhaps it could be. And also, could it be just the government coming after Anthropic because, you know, of their prior relationship? Let me know what you think in the comments. This personally sucks because I was really getting further along with my own projects. I have like four different projects going on at the same time, and I was I was able to just nail them out within the past few days.
Now, we know that's what everybody's been doing anyways because June 22nd, they're going to be switching to the API model pricing where it becomes substantially more expensive. So, at the end of the day, what does this really boil down to? It boils down to competition. We need max [ __ ] competition in the AI space. We don't want what Anthropic wants. And they eagerly want this, and so do all the other top AI firms out there. One of these large companies, I'm not sure if it was Anthropic, but they even said they want an FDA-like panel for approving AI.
Well, you know what the FDA's like? It's It's It's extremely lengthy process, and it costs billions of dollars. Not because they're trying to keep people safe, that's what they tell you. It's simply because they want to reduce competition. So, the corporations buy the parasitical political class, and they essentially say, "Give us laws that make it very difficult for other people to compete." This has been happening forever. That's actually why marijuana was made illegal because of the hemp industry. Hemp was a a superior product to many of the different textile industries. All right. So, I'm obviously nerding out over here.
I'm a little bit butt hurt because, you know, I've been using Fable 5, and now apparently they're removing it. Let me know what you think in the comments. I'm going to sleep. Goodbye.
More from DesignCourse
Get daily recaps from
DesignCourse
AI-powered summaries delivered to your inbox. Save hours every week while staying fully informed.









