Buying a Cheaper MacBook in 2026

Dave2D| 00:10:42|Apr 2, 2026
Chapters9
Introduces the MacBook Neo as a capable but confusing entry with 8GB RAM and limited ports, suitable for light use but with caveats.

Dave2D argues the best value in 2026 is a mid-range MacBook Air (M4/M5) with 16GB RAM, while warning about the Neo for only light use and noting Pro upgrades mainly benefit pro workflows.

Summary

Dave2D breaks down the current MacBook lineup and crowns the sweet spot for most buyers: the M4/M5 MacBook Air with 16GB RAM. He starts by praising the Neo as surprisingly capable for its $500–$600 price, but cautions about only having 8GB RAM and limited ports, which will bite you with future macOS bloat and peripheral-heavy workloads. He then highlights the refurbished M4 Air at $760 as a strong value, especially with 16GB RAM, MagSafe, Thunderbolt 4/5, and the ability to run two external displays. Dave contrasts generations, noting that newer Airs close the performance gap with the Pro line, and even outperform the old M1 Pro/Max in many workflows. When discussing the MacBook Pro, he emphasizes the higher cost and the marginal gains for shorter projects, but acknowledges substantial benefits for developers like Xcode users, GPU-heavy tasks, and long, complex renders. He also covers practical buying tips: prioritize memory, consider battery and thermals (fanless design on Air with throttle under heavy load), and remember that mainstream usage can still be perfectly served by a cost-efficient setup. Throughout, he reminds viewers that these are tools for work, and that saving money doesn’t have to come at the expense of real-world performance.

Key Takeaways

  • 8GB RAM on the Neo will feel slower in a few years as macOS adds features and memory usage grows; aim for 16GB if possible.
  • ] ,
  • ],

Who Is This For?

Ideal for macOS buyers weighing the 2026 lineup: students or light users curious about the Neo, professionals evaluating whether Airs (M4/M5) meet their workflow, or developers and content creators considering Pro vs Air with budget constraints.

Notable Quotes

"The big one is the 8 gigs of RAM. So, it runs perfectly right now with 8 gigs."
Highlights a key limitation of the Neo that affects long-term performance.
"If you have $200 or $300 more you can spend on a laptop, you can enter the MacBook Air territory. And this is where I think the sweet spot lies."
Dave2D recommends the mid-range Air as best value.
"The M4 and M5 devices in particular have such good performance that they can legitimately outperform the beloved M1 Pro and M1 Max for a lot of workflows."
Emphasizes Air performance parity with older Pro lines.
"Memory is super expensive from Apple and you can't ever upgrade it. So, I just always give that priority."
Reinforces RAM as the most important upgrade decision.

Questions This Video Answers

  • Is the Neo worth buying in 2026 for everyday tasks like web browsing and email?
MacBook NeoMacBook Air M4MacBook Air M5MacBook Pro (14/16)RAM prioritizationMagSafeThunderbolt 4/5AV1 hardware decodingXcode performanceGPU vs CPU bottlenecks
Full Transcript
The MacBook lineup right now is the best it's ever been. But at the same time, it's the most confusing it's ever been because there's so many devices to choose from. We have the new MacBook Neos. There's four different colors. We have multiple generations of MacBook Airs to choose from. And we have multiple generations of MacBook Pros to choose from. These are all wrapped in the new retro skin from Dbrand. But I'm going to break it down so you know what's what and also so you're not wasting money on performance that you just really don't use. All right, let's start with the Neo. If you are a student or if you just need a light computer for I don't know web browsing, email test, this is the obvious choice. And if you look at Apple's marketing around this, they pitch it for that kind of entrylevel computing device, right? It's like it's meant to be an inexpensive $500, $600 machine that kind of gets you into the gateway of the Apple or like the Mac ecosystem. Uh the thing is this is capable of so much more. Like you'll see a lot of clickbait headlines of how the chip because it's a phone chip isn't strong enough or how eight gigs of RAM is limiting on this. It's not it's not powerful enough or this and that. Like that's all like clickbait cap. This is an amazing machine. Arguably the best $500 machine. It's able to handle Photoshop really well on it. Video editors can edit with it. Developers can develop with it. Music producers can produce with it. I'm not saying it's the best laptop possible for those tasks, but for $500 or $600, I don't think you're going to find anything better. There's a reason why Windows laptop manufacturers are so worried about this the presence of this device. Now, there are several hardware shortcomings that I think you should be aware of with this device. So, the big one is the 8 gigs of RAM. So, it runs perfectly right now with 8 gigs. Uh the way that Mac OS handles memory swap really effective at making 8 gigs feel enough. However, in a few years time, because this Mac OS as it gets new generations and new versions, it's just going to get bigger and more bloated to as they add more features and more stuff to make the system a little bit more advanced. This in a few years time with 8 gigs of RAM will absolutely feel slower than it does today. And my prediction is in like four years time, it's not going to feel snappy. It's also the trajectory of Mac OS. They are aiming for implementing more and more Apple intelligence and that uses memory. Just understand that a 16 GB system on Mac OS will invariably feel better and smoother and more responsive in a few years time than a 8 GB system. Now, the second shortcoming is the ports. There are two ports on the Neos. The left one is USB 3, the right one is USB 2. And if one's plugged in, you just have one for the peripherals. Now, if you are someone who has to plug up several like external drives or you want to produce music on this thing, you want to have like your your audio interface and your MIDI controller, like things just use ports. And with only one usable port once it's charging, and it's a USB 3 port at best, it just limits what this thing can do when it comes to connectivity with peripherals. The other more expensive MacBooks just handle more. The last thing I want to mention is the battery life. It's good, but it's not like the legendary battery life that a lot of MacBooks usually have. It's because it's a physically smaller battery. It's particularly rough if you bump up screen brightness. The webcam and mic are pretty good if you compare across the MacBooks, but if you compare it to like any of the five or $600 laptops out there, these are amazing. Hello. Hello. Now, if the MacBook Neo isn't the right fit for you and you have $200 or $300 more that you can spend on a laptop, you can enter the MacBook Air territory. And this is where I think the sweet spot of the whole lineup lies. In particular, the refurbished M4 MacBook Air that's available on Apple's website for $760. So, this is a device that gets you 16 gigs of RAM and you can get Apple Care and Apple's warranty, like all of it as if it was a brand new machine, and it's priced at $760 US. Now, this machine, starting with the M2 devices and higher, get a MagSafe charging port. So, you get a dedicated charging thing as well as the two USBC. And these USBC ports support Thunderbolt, Thunderbolt 4 for the previous generation, Thunderbolt 5 for the newest stuff, but this allows you to connect really high-speed peripherals and just connectivity in general. Uh, the other thing is that the M4 and newer MacBook Airs allowed two external displays while running the internal one concurrently. So, if you need lots of displays, M4 or higher. Now, at this point, we're looking at five generations of MacBook Airs from M5 all the way down to M1. The single and multi-core performance has improved a lot over those years, making everything feel faster and more responsive. The M4 and M5 devices in particular have such good performance that they can legitimately outperform the beloved M1 Pro and M1 Max for a lot of workflows. So, when those devices came out, the M1 Pro and M1 Max MacBook Pros, they had really impressive performance, but they were crazy expensive. And I think a lot of people still use their device that they bought back then. But it's even more impressive that now a mid-tier MacBook Air product can keep up with those devices. And the point I'm trying to make is that if you're drawn to the Pro devices because like the marketing says that, you know, you're professional, you should probably buy the professional laptop, MacBook Pro, there's a very good chance, a very real chance that one of the M4 or M5 MacBook Air products will absolutely handle your workflow very comfortably. Now, in terms of upgrades, if you have the budget, the number one thing I would prioritize is memory. If you are looking at an older MacBook Air that only has 8 gigs, like skip it. Do your best to just save a little bit more and get a system with 16 gigs. It'll make a difference in a few years. Like a very noticeable difference, I believe. Uh the other thing is storage. Obviously, more storage is better, but it's the thing that I would skip. It's just a convenience thing. You can always connect external drives. The other thing is the GPU. Uh Photoshop does not benefit all that much from those extra two GPU cores. A lot of Photoshop is still CPU and RAM dependent or just bound by those things. So, the GPU is not much. Uh, if you really lean in heavily on video editing and 3D stuff and you're using a MacBook Air, perfectly good for it. That point, maybe go for the GPU if your budget allows for it. But it's a perfectly good system without those extra GPU cores. Uh, the MacBook Air does not have a fan, which makes it completely silent, but if you crank it hard for like eight or nine minutes, it will throttle down to protect itself from the heat. So, short renders and builds are totally fine. You won't even notice that it's a fanless system. But if you have long sustained like continuous workloads, like if you are, you know, if you're doing a 3D render and it takes 45 minutes for Blender to push it out, you will have limitations on this and you absolutely would do better on a MacBook Pro system. Those have fans. But I bring this all up because the way that people looked at the MacBook Air when it first launched, like build times were much longer back then that they just weren't as powerful systems. So you would wait like 15 minutes, 20 minutes for a build or like a render to finish. And those like when you have time of that long, of course, you're going to notice a like a thermal limitation. But nowadays, I make one of my YouTube videos. I don't make super long videos, but they'll be done way before this thing starts to throttle. And I'm like, the MacBook Air, it can save you thousands of dollars in exchange for 2 or 3 minutes of your time every time you hit the render button. And for some people who only render once or twice a week, it might be worth those savings. Now, the battery life on the Air is really good. And starting with the M3 devices and newer, those had AV1 hardware decoding. So if you're streaming in Netflix or YouTube or just stuff with AV1 videos, you would get better battery life on those devices. Okay. Now, if you have an even bigger budget, you can go to the MacBook Pro. And these are the most powerful MacBooks, but also the most brutal to buy because uh for one, they're the most expensive, but they're also the most number of configurations you get, like GPU, CPU, RAM configurations, plus different sizes. And the price for all this stuff adds up really quickly. Now, if you're just looking at performance compared to the M4 and M5 MacBook Air, video editors actually see the lowest gains here. The MacBook Pros are faster for sure, but not by a significant enough margin to make it an obvious upgrade, especially on shorter projects. But if you have lots of layers or like huge projects or you use a ton of you know GPUheavy effects then yes it does become more cost effective on a pro or a max chip especially M4 or higher. Xcode users can see some big gains going to the MacBook Pros with the Pro and the Max chips. It's two things. First is more memory and the other thing is higher memory bandwidth and Xcode loves those two things. If you have big projects with really long compile times, the MacBook Pros can be really good for it. The same thing goes for local AI tasks. 3D apps that can take advantage of the GPU cores also really benefit with the Pro and Max chips with their massive GPU count. It can get very expensive though, but ultimately it becomes a question of like how much money are you willing to pay to save time, right? And for some people spending thousands of dollars to shave off a few minutes is an absolute necessity in their workflow. But for others, it's like it would not benefit them nearly enough to pay that kind of money. So, it just depends on what your workflow is and how much money you want to spend on it. Now, there's a couple of the things that you get with the MacBook Pro. It's not just performance, right? There's a whole list of quality of life features that you get on this device. The big one is the screen. You get better colors, better contrast, you get higher refresh rate with matte finish options. Uh, you also have a built-in SD card reader, and you also have a bigger battery, so you get better battery life. You get an extra Thunderbolt port and HDMI port. You can handle more external displays. You get better speakers. The speakers on the 16-in are phenomenal. Like, if you care about audio, like I've done measurements on these things. They're just fantastic speakers. Speakers on the MacBook Air are already really good. But the ones on the MacBook Pros are just truly phenomenal. Now, my thoughts on upgrading a MacBook Pro. Uh, the first thing is size. So, the very first MacBook Pro I bought, the M1, I got a 16-inch. I'm like, "This is going to be awesome. 16-in screen, it's going to be great." But this is a relatively heavy device. And because the 14-in devices are so capable, you get the same kind of performance for much less weight. Uh obviously smaller screen, but I just found it so much more portable and I travel a lot. So I'm like I go with the 14. So you kind of if you have an opportunity to go to the store, like feel these things, put them in your bag, just I think a lot of people who buy the 16 end up not regretting it, but they're like, "Ah, maybe the 14-inch would have been better fit just because they travel a lot with it." Uh the other thing again, prioritize RAM. Memory is super expensive from Apple and you can't ever upgrade it. So, I just always give that priority. Uh, if you ever need extra storage, you can always plug up some devices. Okay, that pretty much wraps it up. Keep in mind, like I've said this every time I've done one of these videos, these are tools. As attractive as Apple makes like the marketing around this stuff, like these are literally just tools to do whatever is that you do for work. And if you can save some money, like you'd be surprised as to how low of a device you can get in terms of like the cost of it and still get away with really good performance nowadays. Okay, hope you guys enjoyed this video.

Get daily recaps from
Dave2D

AI-powered summaries delivered to your inbox. Save hours every week while staying fully informed.